Woodford vs Glass House Mountains
Woodford is the younger of the two, with a median age of 38 against 42 in Glass House Mountains. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Glass House Mountains, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Glass House Mountains: a median of $1.18 million, against $848,000 in Woodford, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Woodford tends to suit young adults, people living alone, and buyers on a tighter budget, while Glass House Mountains suits families with children and couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Glass House Mountains
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (23 vs 8)
- carries lower crime risk (52/100 vs 64/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (70% vs 61%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Woodford
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($847,500 vs $1,182,000)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Woodford
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($328/wk vs $400/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Glass House Mountains
ahead on 3 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (37/100 vs 0/100)
- has a shorter drive in (66 min vs 75 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (70 km vs 77.2 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Glass House Mountains
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (37/100 vs 0/100)
- carries lower crime risk (52/100 vs 64/100)
- But Woodford has more GPs (3 vs 1)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Woodford
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- is growing faster (16.3% vs 10.6%)
- returns a higher gross yield on houses (4.3% vs 3.1%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Woodford and Glass House Mountains drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Glass House Mountains has more residents (5,601 vs 4,022); Glass House Mountains has higher household incomes ($90,480 vs $72,436).
| Woodford | Glass House Mountains | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,022 | 5,601 +39% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +16.3% | +10.6% |
| Median age | 38 | 42 |
| Median household income | $72,436/yr | $90,480/yr +25% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $328/wk | $400/wk +22% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.9%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.6%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Woodford | Glass House Mountains | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $847,500 | $1,182,000 |
| Median unit price | $662,000 | — |
| Median land price | $1,100,000 | $1,034,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 34 days from 42 sales | 32 days from 84 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
44 vs 32 sales
33 vs 111 sales
12 vs 26 sales
Development activity
| Woodford | Glass House Mountains | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 6,996 across Moreton Bay | 2,962 across Sunshine Coast |
| Approvals change year on year | +49% | -41% |
Gross rental yield
| Woodford | Glass House Mountains | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.3% $725/wk on $875K | 3.1% $740/wk on $1.26M |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Woodford | Glass House Mountains | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 42% of QLD | Higher than 64% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 39% of QLD | Higher than 83% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 72% of QLD | Higher than 73% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 75% of QLD | Higher than 78% of QLD |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 69% of QLD | Higher than 12% of QLD |
Liveability
Glass House Mountains is more walkable (37 vs 0); Glass House Mountains scores higher overall (41 vs 30).
| Woodford | Glass House Mountains | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | D | C |
| Score | 30/100 | 41/100 |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 2/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 |
Risk profile
Glass House Mountains carries more bushfire risk (49 vs 21); Woodford carries more crime risk (64 vs 52).
| Woodford | Glass House Mountains | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 21/100 | Moderate 49/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 64/100 | Moderate 52/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km | 4 within 5 km |
Schools
| Woodford | Glass House Mountains | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 0 |
Schools in Woodford
- Woodford State School Government · Combined below peers
Schools in Glass House Mountains
- Glass House Mountains State School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Woodford | Glass House Mountains | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 2 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 4 | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 23 |
| Childcare | 4 | 3 |
| GPs | 3 | 1 |
| Pharmacies | 2 | 1 |
| Police stations | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 2 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 20 | 29 |
Mobility
Woodford sits further from the CBD (77.2 km vs 70 km).
| Woodford | Glass House Mountains | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 37/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 77.2 km +9% vs other | 70 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 75 min | 66 min |
| Public transport score | 27/100 Bus | 46/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 5.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 3.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 17.5 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.7% postcode 4514 | 0.7% postcode 4518 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (78.3%).
Setting
| Woodford | Glass House Mountains | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 134 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 39 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 24.2 km | 11.6 km |
NBN connectivity
| Woodford | Glass House Mountains | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 64/100 | 69/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 38% 1,409 premises | 46% 2,464 premises |
Climate
| Woodford | Glass House Mountains | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 950 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Woodford | Glass House Mountains | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,577/yr | $1,690/yr |
| Council | Moreton Bay | Sunshine Coast |
Federal electorate
| Woodford | Glass House Mountains | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Longman | Fisher |
| Member | Terry Young | Andrew Wallace |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Woodford | Glass House Mountains | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Woodford
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Woodford
Other comparisons with Glass House Mountains
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.