Wonga Park vs Chirnside Park
Chirnside Park is the younger of the two, with a median age of 38 against 45 in Wonga Park. In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Wonga Park: a median of $1.53 million, against $950,000 in Chirnside Park, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Wonga Park tends to suit couples, while Chirnside Park suits buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Wonga Park
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (16/100 vs 70/100)
- has more parks and reserves (21 vs 11)
- is already more of a family suburb (82% vs 72%)
- But Chirnside Park has more childcare (7 vs 2)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Chirnside Park
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper houses ($950,000 vs $1,527,500)
- has cheaper land ($1,132,500 vs $1,380,000)
- But Wonga Park leaves households under less mortgage stress (19% vs 24%)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Chirnside Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($443/wk vs $491/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Wonga Park
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (53/100 vs 22/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (36.5 km vs 40.5 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Wonga Park
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (16/100 vs 70/100)
- is more walkable (53/100 vs 22/100)
- But Chirnside Park has more GPs (3 vs 0)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Chirnside Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (19.3% vs 1.2%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Wonga Park and Chirnside Park drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Chirnside Park has more residents (11,779 vs 3,843); Wonga Park has higher household incomes ($145,080 vs $108,368).
| Wonga Park | Chirnside Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,843 | 11,779 +207% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +1.2% | +19.3% |
| Median age | 45 | 38 |
| Median household income | $145,080/yr +25% vs other | $108,368/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $491/wk +10% vs other | $443/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.5%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.5%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.6%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Wonga Park | Chirnside Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,527,500 | $950,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $690,000 |
| Median land price | $1,380,000 | $1,132,500 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 46 days from 34 sales | 19 days from 136 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
13 vs 116 sales
48 vs 108 sales
15 vs 28 sales
Zoning mix
Wonga Park has more land zoned for conservation (65% vs 0%); Chirnside Park has more rural and farming land (66% vs 7%).
| Wonga Park | Chirnside Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 7% | 66% |
| Environmental | 65% | 0% |
| Residential | 11% | 19% |
| Parks and recreation | 16% | 1% |
| Other and special use | 0% | 8% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 1% | 4% |
| Commercial | 0% | 2% |
| Industrial | 0% | 1% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Wonga Park | Chirnside Park | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 486 across Manningham | 416 across Yarra Ranges |
| Approvals change year on year | -2% | -57% |
Gross rental yield
| Wonga Park | Chirnside Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 4.5% $750/wk on $858K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| Wonga Park | Chirnside Park | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 79% of VIC | Higher than 64% of VIC |
| Income | Higher than 98% of VIC | Higher than 81% of VIC |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 86% of VIC | Higher than 80% of VIC |
| Affordability | Higher than 59% of VIC | Higher than 60% of VIC |
| EV adoption | Higher than 83% of VIC | Higher than 70% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 93% of VIC | Higher than 96% of VIC |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 92% of VIC |
Liveability
Wonga Park is more walkable (53 vs 22); Wonga Park scores higher overall (60 vs 39).
| Wonga Park | Chirnside Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | C |
| Score | 60/100 | 39/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 | advantaged area decile 8/10 |
Risk profile
Chirnside Park carries more crime risk (70 vs 16).
| Wonga Park | Chirnside Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 87/100 | High 86/100 |
| Crime | Low 16/100 | High 70/100 |
| Flood | Moderate 57/100 | Moderate 56/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km | 4 within 5 km |
Schools
| Wonga Park | Chirnside Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 2 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 2 |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Wonga Park
- Wonga Park Primary School Government · Primary at peers
Schools in Chirnside Park
- Chirnside Park Primary School Government · Primary above peers
- Oxley Christian College Independent · Combined above peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Wonga Park | Chirnside Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 | 3 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 2 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 21 | 11 |
| Childcare | 2 | 7 |
| GPs | 0 | 3 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 2 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 4 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 3 |
| EV chargers | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 3 | 4 |
Mobility
Chirnside Park sits further from the CBD (40.5 km vs 36.5 km).
| Wonga Park | Chirnside Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 53/100 | 22/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 36.5 km | 40.5 km +11% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 43 min | 44 min |
| Public transport score | 76/100 Bus | 78/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 59.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 160.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.3% postcode 3115 | 0.8% postcode 3116 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 45 postcode 3115 | 37 postcode 3116 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (66.4%).
Setting
| Wonga Park | Chirnside Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 132 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 100 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 29.8 km | 33.2 km |
NBN connectivity
| Wonga Park | Chirnside Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 86/100 | 90/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 51% 1,376 premises | 57% 4,929 premises |
Climate
| Wonga Park | Chirnside Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 777 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 26.9°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.3°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Wonga Park | Chirnside Park | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | — same for both | |
| PM10 | 15.5 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Wonga Park | Chirnside Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,000/yr | $2,161/yr |
| Council | Manningham | Yarra Ranges |
Federal electorate
| Wonga Park | Chirnside Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Casey same for both | |
| Member | Aaron Violi same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Wonga Park | Chirnside Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Wonga Park
Other comparisons with Chirnside Park
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.