Williams Landing vs Truganina
In both, most households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Williams Landing: a median of $875,000, against $678,000 in Truganina, and rent is higher there too. Williams Landing is closer to the city centre: 24.8 km, against 32.1 km. On these figures, Truganina tends to suit families with children and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Truganina
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more schools inside the suburb (11 vs 0)
- has more childcare (31 vs 6)
- has more parks and reserves (27 vs 12)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Truganina
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- has cheaper land ($673,500 vs $915,500)
- has cheaper houses ($677,500 vs $875,000)
- But Williams Landing has cheaper units ($420,000 vs $527,500)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Williams Landing
ahead on 3 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (69/100 vs 0/100)
- has a shorter drive in (27 min vs 38 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (24.8 km vs 32.1 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 5 things we measure here
- Williams Landing is more walkable (69/100 vs 0/100)
- Truganina has more GPs (4 vs 2)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Williams Landing returns a higher gross yield on units (5.5% vs 4.3%)
- Truganina is growing faster (75.5% vs 42.2%)
Weighs house yield, unit yield, and population growth.
Where they sit
Williams Landing and Truganina drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Truganina has more residents (36,305 vs 9,448); Williams Landing has higher household incomes ($134,264 vs $110,552).
| Williams Landing | Truganina | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,448 | 36,305 +284% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +42.2% | +75.5% |
| Median age | 31 | 30 |
| Median household income | $134,264/yr +18% vs other | $110,552/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $420/wk +7% vs other | $390/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.0%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (26.6%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Williams Landing | Truganina | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $875,000 | $677,500 |
| Median unit price | $420,000 | $527,500 |
| Median land price | $915,500 | $673,500 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 36 days from 155 sales | 50 days from 729 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
39 vs 305 sales
120 vs 559 sales
23 vs 60 sales
Zoning mix
Williams Landing has more commercially zoned land (72% vs 0%); Truganina has more industrially zoned land (11% vs 0%).
| Williams Landing | Truganina | |
|---|---|---|
| Commercial | 72% | 0% |
| Residential | 19% | 63% |
| Other and special use | 0% | 13% |
| Industrial | 0% | 11% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 7% | 3% |
| Rural and farming | 0% | 5% |
| Environmental | 0% | 4% |
| Parks and recreation | 2% | 1% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Williams Landing | Truganina | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 4,045 across Wyndham | 4,602 across Melton |
| Approvals change year on year | -0% | +5% |
Gross rental yield
| Williams Landing | Truganina | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.8% $650/wk on $880K | 4.0% $530/wk on $690K |
| Units | 5.5% $450/wk on $428K | 4.3% $470/wk on $562K |
Ranking within VIC
| Williams Landing | Truganina | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 60% of VIC | Higher than 35% of VIC |
| Income | — | Higher than 84% of VIC |
| Schools | — | Higher than 47% of VIC |
| Walkability | Higher than 90% of VIC | Higher than 39% of VIC |
| Affordability | — | Higher than 93% of VIC |
| EV adoption | Higher than 99% of VIC | Higher than 85% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 98% of VIC same for both | |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 57% of VIC | Higher than 68% of VIC |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 83% of VIC | Higher than 24% of VIC |
Liveability
Williams Landing is more walkable (69 vs 0); Williams Landing scores higher overall (60 vs 40).
| Williams Landing | Truganina | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | C |
| Score | 60/100 | 40/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 | advantaged area decile 7/10 |
Risk profile
Truganina carries more flood risk (19 vs 0); Williams Landing carries more bushfire risk (94 vs 76).
| Williams Landing | Truganina | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 94/100 | High 76/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 69/100 | High 77/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 | Low 19/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 13 within 5 km | 7 within 5 km |
Schools
| Williams Landing | Truganina | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 11 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 2 |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 3 |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 4 |
Schools in Williams Landing
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Truganina
- Al-Taqwa College Independent · Combined above peers
- Westbourne Grammar School Independent · Combined above peers
- St Clare's Catholic Primary School Catholic · Primary at peers
- Truganina P-9 College Government · Combined at peers
- Warreen Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- Bemin Secondary College Government · Secondary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Williams Landing | Truganina | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 | 2 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 same for both | |
| Parks & reserves | 12 | 27 |
| Childcare | 6 | 31 |
| GPs | 2 | 4 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 2 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 12 |
| Waterways | 0 | 36 |
Mobility
Truganina sits further from the CBD (32.1 km vs 24.8 km).
| Williams Landing | Truganina | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 69/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 24.8 km | 32.1 km +29% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 27 min | 38 min |
| Public transport score | 93/100 Rail · Bus | 79/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 162.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 284.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 3.4% postcode 3027 | 1.4% postcode 3029 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 46 postcode 3027 | 69 postcode 3029 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (60.9%).
Setting
| Williams Landing | Truganina | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 19 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 57 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 6.3 km | 12.4 km |
NBN connectivity
| Williams Landing | Truganina | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 97/100 | 96/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 85% 3,804 premises | 81% 13,865 premises |
Climate
| Williams Landing | Truganina | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 482 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 25.9°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.2°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Williams Landing | Truganina | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | — same for both | |
| PM10 | — | 23.2 µg/m³ |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Williams Landing | Truganina | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,997/yr | $1,779/yr |
| Council | Wyndham | Melton |
Federal electorate
| Williams Landing | Truganina | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Gellibrand | Gorton |
| Member | Tim Watts | Alice Jordan-Baird |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Williams Landing | Truganina | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Williams Landing
Truganina
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Williams Landing
Other comparisons with Truganina
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.