Williams Landing vs Laverton
In both, the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Williams Landing, most households own their home and most households are couple families. In Laverton, about half of households rent. Houses cost more in Williams Landing: a median of $875,000, against $612,000 in Laverton, and rent is higher there too. Laverton is closer to the city centre: 21.3 km, against 24.8 km. On these figures, Williams Landing tends to suit families with children and couples, while Laverton suits people living alone and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Williams Landing
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- is already more of a family suburb (77% vs 49%)
- carries lower crime risk (69/100 vs 90/100)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (89% vs 78%)
- But Laverton has more schools inside the suburb (4 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Williams Landing leaves households under less mortgage stress (19% vs 26%)
- Laverton has cheaper houses ($611,750 vs $875,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Williams Landing leaves renters under less rental stress (16% vs 22%)
- Laverton has cheaper rent ($330/wk vs $420/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Laverton
ahead on 3 of the 4 things we measure here
- gets more of its commuters onto trains and trams (14% vs 7%)
- sits closer to the CBD (21.3 km vs 24.8 km)
- is more walkable (78/100 vs 69/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Laverton
ahead on 4 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more residents already 65 and over (9% vs 4%)
- has more GPs (4 vs 2)
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (22% vs 11%)
- But Williams Landing carries lower crime risk (69/100 vs 90/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Williams Landing
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- is growing faster (42.2% vs -3.2%)
- returns a higher gross yield on units (5.5% vs 4.5%)
Weighs house yield, unit yield, and population growth.
Where they sit
Williams Landing and Laverton drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Williams Landing has more residents (9,448 vs 4,760); Williams Landing has higher household incomes ($134,264 vs $78,624).
| Williams Landing | Laverton | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,448 +50% vs other | 4,760 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +42.2% | -3.2% |
| Median age | 31 | 32 |
| Median household income | $134,264/yr +41% vs other | $78,624/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $420/wk +21% vs other | $330/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (26.1%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.0%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.5%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Williams Landing | Laverton | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $875,000 | $611,750 |
| Median unit price | $420,000 | $506,300 |
| Median land price | $915,500 | $650,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 36 days from 155 sales | 44 days from 88 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
39 vs 119 sales
120 vs 18 sales
Zoning mix
Williams Landing has more commercially zoned land (72% vs 1%).
| Williams Landing | Laverton | |
|---|---|---|
| Commercial | 72% | 1% |
| Other and special use | 0% | 39% |
| Residential | 19% | 39% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 7% | 14% |
| Parks and recreation | 2% | 4% |
| Industrial | 0% | 2% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Williams Landing | Laverton | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 4,045 across Wyndham | 1,028 across Hobsons Bay |
| Approvals change year on year | -0% | +206% |
Gross rental yield
| Williams Landing | Laverton | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.8% $650/wk on $880K | 4.2% $522/wk on $642K |
| Units | 5.5% $450/wk on $428K | 4.5% $450/wk on $515K |
Ranking within VIC
| Williams Landing | Laverton | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 60% of VIC | Higher than 27% of VIC |
| Income | — | Higher than 46% of VIC |
| Schools | — | Higher than 58% of VIC |
| Walkability | Higher than 90% of VIC | Higher than 92% of VIC |
| Affordability | — | Higher than 72% of VIC |
| EV adoption | Higher than 99% of VIC | Higher than 66% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 98% of VIC | Higher than 97% of VIC |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 57% of VIC | Higher than 82% of VIC |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 83% of VIC | Higher than 34% of VIC |
Liveability
Williams Landing scores higher overall (60 vs 51); Laverton is more walkable (78 vs 69).
| Williams Landing | Laverton | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 60/100 | 51/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 | below-average income decile 2/10 |
Risk profile
Williams Landing carries more bushfire risk (94 vs 0); Laverton carries more flood risk (35 vs 0).
| Williams Landing | Laverton | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 94/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 69/100 | High 90/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 | Low 35/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 13 within 5 km | 22 within 5 km |
Schools
| Williams Landing | Laverton | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 4 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 2 |
Schools in Williams Landing
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Laverton
- Laverton P-12 College Government · Combined above peers
- St Martin de Porres School Catholic · Primary below peers
- Western Autistic School Government · Combined · Special school below peers
- Jennings Street School Government · Combined · Special school
Amenities in the suburb
| Williams Landing | Laverton | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 | 4 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 | 12 |
| Parks & reserves | 12 | 13 |
| Childcare | 6 same for both | |
| GPs | 2 | 4 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 2 |
| Police stations | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 2 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 0 | 7 |
Mobility
Williams Landing sits further from the CBD (24.8 km vs 21.3 km).
| Williams Landing | Laverton | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 69/100 | 78/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 24.8 km +14% vs other | 21.3 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 27 min same for both | |
| Public transport score | 93/100 Rail · Bus | 95/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 162.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 157.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 3.4% postcode 3027 | 0.7% postcode 3028 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 46 postcode 3027 | 30 postcode 3028 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (57.2%).
Setting
| Williams Landing | Laverton | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 19 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 16 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 6.3 km | 4.6 km |
NBN connectivity
| Williams Landing | Laverton | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 97/100 | 91/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 85% 3,804 premises | 57% 2,770 premises |
Climate
| Williams Landing | Laverton | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 482 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 25.9°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.2°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Williams Landing | Laverton | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | — same for both | |
| PM10 | — same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Williams Landing | Laverton | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,997/yr | $2,677/yr |
| Council | Wyndham | Hobsons Bay |
Federal electorate
| Williams Landing | Laverton | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Gellibrand same for both | |
| Member | Tim Watts same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Williams Landing | Laverton | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Williams Landing
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Williams Landing
Other comparisons with Laverton
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.