White Patch vs Toorbul
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Toorbul, about half of households are people living alone. Houses cost more in White Patch: a median of $1.4 million, against $815,000 in Toorbul, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Toorbul tends to suit people living alone and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
White Patch
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (12/100 vs 50/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (64% vs 45%)
- But Toorbul has more parks and reserves (3 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Toorbul
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($815,000 vs $1,401,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Toorbul
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (25% vs 7%)
- has cheaper rent ($325/wk vs $475/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Toorbul
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (16/100 vs 0/100)
- has a shorter drive in (58 min vs 76 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (61.9 km vs 71.1 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- White Patch carries lower crime risk (12/100 vs 50/100)
- Toorbul is more walkable (16/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
White Patch and Toorbul drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Toorbul has more residents (958 vs 150); White Patch has higher household incomes ($92,248 vs $59,748).
| White Patch | Toorbul | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 150 | 958 +539% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +5.6% | +3.0% |
| Median age | 56 | 57 |
| Median household income | $92,248/yr +35% vs other | $59,748/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $475/wk +32% vs other | $325/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (25.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (12.7%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (26.7%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| White Patch | Toorbul | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,401,000 | $815,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $1,650,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 53 days from 12 sales |
Development activity
| White Patch | Toorbul | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 6,996 across Moreton Bay same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +49% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| White Patch | Toorbul | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 65% of QLD | Higher than 24% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 37% of QLD | Higher than 77% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 79% of QLD | Higher than 64% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 85% of QLD | Higher than 48% of QLD |
Liveability
Toorbul is more walkable (16 vs 0).
| White Patch | Toorbul | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | D |
| Score | — | 32/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 | below-average income decile 2/10 |
Risk profile
Toorbul carries more crime risk (50 vs 12); White Patch carries more bushfire risk (87 vs 39).
| White Patch | Toorbul | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 87/100 | Low 39/100 |
| Crime | Low 12/100 | Moderate 50/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | Moderate 46/100 | Low 36/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| White Patch | Toorbul | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| White Patch | Toorbul | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 3 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 0 | 1 |
Mobility
White Patch sits further from the CBD (71.1 km vs 61.9 km).
| White Patch | Toorbul | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 16/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 71.1 km +13% vs other | 61.9 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 76 min | 58 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.9% postcode 4507 | 0.5% postcode 4510 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 79 postcode 4507 | 74 postcode 4510 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (78.3%).
Setting
| White Patch | Toorbul | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 3 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 1 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 83 m | 1.5 km |
NBN connectivity
| White Patch | Toorbul | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 75/100 | 30/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 54% 74 premises | 0% 507 premises |
Climate
| White Patch | Toorbul | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,052 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 27.8°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 14.7°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| White Patch | Toorbul | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.4 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 14.7 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.43 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| White Patch | Toorbul | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,577/yr same for both | |
| Council | Moreton Bay same for both | |
Federal electorate
| White Patch | Toorbul | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Longman same for both | |
| Member | Terry Young same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| White Patch | Toorbul | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with White Patch
Other comparisons with Toorbul
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.