White Hills vs Nunamara
Nunamara is the younger of the two, with a median age of 45 against 49 in White Hills. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In White Hills, about half of households are couple families. In Nunamara, most households are couple families. On these figures, White Hills tends to suit older residents.
White Hills and Nunamara are both small, quiet Tasmanian communities with notably different rental markets. Nunamara has a larger population of 305 compared to White Hills' 172, and offers significantly lower weekly rent at $100 versus $275. However, White Hills is closer to the CBD at 196.1 km and carries a lower bushfire risk rating of 32 compared to Nunamara's 42. Nunamara's median household income is higher at $87,360 annually, which may reflect its larger resident base, while both suburbs sit in the same socio-economic decile.
Written by an AI language model from the figures below. Every number in it is checked against those figures before it is published.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Nunamara
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more parks and reserves (8 vs 1)
Weighs schools, house stock, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Nunamara
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (16% vs 22%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Nunamara
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (6% vs 21%)
- has cheaper rent ($100/wk vs $275/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
White Hills
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (142 min vs 160 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (196.1 km vs 218.8 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
White Hills
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more residents already 65 and over (26% vs 13%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, and walkability.
Investors
Nunamara
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (4.8% vs -5.5%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
White Hills and Nunamara drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
White Hills rents higher ($275/wk vs $100/wk); Nunamara has more residents (305 vs 172).
| White Hills | Nunamara | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 172 | 305 +77% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -5.5% | +4.8% |
| Median age | 49 | 45 |
| Median household income | $69,316/yr | $87,360/yr +26% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $275/wk +64% vs other | $100/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (2.3%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.4%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Zoning mix
Nunamara has more land zoned for conservation (19% vs 1%); White Hills has more rural and farming land (98% vs 81%).
| White Hills | Nunamara | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 98% | 81% |
| Environmental | 1% | 19% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 1% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| White Hills | Nunamara | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 208 across Launceston same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -29% same for both | |
Ranking within TAS
| White Hills | Nunamara | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 53% of TAS | Higher than 80% of TAS |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 65% of TAS | Higher than 54% of TAS |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 72% of TAS | Higher than 92% of TAS |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 71% of TAS | Higher than 22% of TAS |
Liveability
| White Hills | Nunamara | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Nunamara carries more bushfire risk (42 vs 32).
| White Hills | Nunamara | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 32/100 | Moderate 42/100 |
| Crime | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| White Hills | Nunamara | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| White Hills | Nunamara | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 8 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 2 | 12 |
Mobility
Nunamara sits further from the CBD (218.8 km vs 196.1 km).
| White Hills | Nunamara | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Hobart | 196.1 km | 218.8 km +12% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 142 min | 160 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.8% postcode 7258 | 1.8% postcode 7259 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 42 postcode 7258 | 40 postcode 7259 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (88.0%).
Setting
| White Hills | Nunamara | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 238 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 666 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| White Hills | Nunamara | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 | 17/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Satellite (Sky Muster) |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 76 premises | 0% 95 premises |
Climate
| White Hills | Nunamara | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 676 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 24.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 3.1°C same for both | |
Council rates
| White Hills | Nunamara | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,075/yr same for both | |
| Council | Launceston same for both | |
Federal electorate
| White Hills | Nunamara | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Bass same for both | |
| Member | Jess Teesdale same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| White Hills | Nunamara | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $20,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with White Hills
Other comparisons with Nunamara
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.