Wetherill Park vs Bossley Park
Comparing Wetherill Park and Bossley Park, NSW: Wetherill Park carries more bushfire risk (36 vs 0); Bossley Park has more residents (15,492 vs 6,412); and Bossley Park scores higher overall (68 vs 36).
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Bossley Park
ahead on 4 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more schools rated above their peers (2 vs 0)
- carries lower crime risk (29/100 vs 86/100)
- has more parks and reserves (17 vs 8)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Wetherill Park sits closer to the CBD (35.5 km vs 37.6 km)
- Bossley Park is more walkable (68/100 vs 53/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Bossley Park
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (29/100 vs 86/100)
- is more walkable (68/100 vs 53/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Wetherill Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- returns a higher gross yield on houses (3.3% vs 2.7%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Wetherill Park and Bossley Park drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Bossley Park has more residents (15,492 vs 6,412).
| Wetherill Park | Bossley Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,412 | 15,492 +142% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +4.7% | +6.2% |
| Median age | 41 same for both | |
| Median household income | $80,912/yr | $80,184/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $480/wk +3% vs other | $465/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (13.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (10.3%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.4%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Wetherill Park | Bossley Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,330,000 | $1,410,001 |
| Median unit price | $840,000 | — |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 26 days from 38 sales | 24 days from 70 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
27 vs 55 sales
31 vs 49 sales
9 vs 28 sales
Zoning mix
Wetherill Park has more industrially zoned land (55% vs 0%).
| Wetherill Park | Bossley Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 15% | 82% |
| Industrial | 55% | 0% |
| Parks and recreation | 2% | 7% |
| Environmental | 1% | 6% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 3% | 4% |
| Rural and farming | 1% | 0% |
| Planning zones cover 78% of Wetherill Park and 100% of Bossley Park. The rest is unzoned land such as water or road reserve. | ||
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Wetherill Park | Bossley Park | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,095 across Fairfield same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +29% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Wetherill Park | Bossley Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.3% $770/wk on $1.22M | 2.7% $750/wk on $1.42M |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Wetherill Park | Bossley Park | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 69% of NSW | Higher than 70% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 48% of NSW | Higher than 47% of NSW |
| Schools | — | Higher than 87% of NSW |
| Walkability | Higher than 82% of NSW | Higher than 88% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 28% of NSW | Higher than 26% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 59% of NSW | Higher than 63% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 74% of NSW | Higher than 86% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 34% of NSW | Higher than 12% of NSW |
Liveability
Bossley Park scores higher overall (68 vs 36); Bossley Park is more walkable (68 vs 53).
| Wetherill Park | Bossley Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | B |
| Score | 36/100 | 68/100 |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 3/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Wetherill Park carries more bushfire risk (36 vs 0); Wetherill Park carries more crime risk (86 vs 29).
| Wetherill Park | Bossley Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 36/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | High 86/100 | Low 29/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 23 within 5 km | 16 within 5 km |
Schools
| Wetherill Park | Bossley Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 2 | 4 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 2 |
| Rated at peers | 1 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 1 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 50 Scott Street Liverpool, 9.1 km | 1 50 Scott Street Liverpool, 7.5 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 2.3% | 2.7% |
Schools in Wetherill Park
- William Stimson Public School Government · Primary at peers
- Aspect Western Sydney School Independent · Combined · Special school below peers
Schools in Bossley Park
- Bossley Park Public School Government · Primary above peers
- Mary Immaculate Catholic Primary School Catholic · Primary above peers
- Bossley Park High School Government · Secondary at peers
- Prairievale Public School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Wetherill Park | Bossley Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 3 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 17 |
| Childcare | 5 | 8 |
| GPs | 3 | 2 |
| Pharmacies | 2 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 2 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 3 | 0 |
| EV chargers | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 11 | 0 |
Mobility
Bossley Park sits further from the CBD (37.6 km vs 35.5 km).
| Wetherill Park | Bossley Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 53/100 | 68/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 35.5 km | 37.6 km +6% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 39 min | 43 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus same for both | |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 385.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 355.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.6% postcode 2164 | 0.6% postcode 2176 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 44 postcode 2164 | 44 postcode 2176 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (57.7%).
Setting
| Wetherill Park | Bossley Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 48 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 54 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 27.2 km | 27.5 km |
NBN connectivity
| Wetherill Park | Bossley Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 65/100 | 76/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Hybrid fibre-coaxial |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 28% 4,599 premises | 9% 4,654 premises |
Climate
| Wetherill Park | Bossley Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 931 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.9°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.9°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Wetherill Park | Bossley Park | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.7 µg/m³ | 6.8 µg/m³ |
| PM10 | 17.6 µg/m³ | 18.2 µg/m³ |
| NO₂ | 0.88 pphm | 0.72 pphm |
Council rates
| Wetherill Park | Bossley Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $990/yr same for both | |
| Council | Fairfield same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Wetherill Park | Bossley Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Mcmahon | Fowler |
| Member | Chris Bowen | Dai Le |
| Party | Australian Labor Party | Independent |
First Home Owner Grant
| Wetherill Park | Bossley Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Wetherill Park
Bossley Park
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Wetherill Park
Other comparisons with Bossley Park
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.