Warrill View vs Rosevale
In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and about half of households are couple families. On these figures, Rosevale tends to suit older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Warrill View
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
- carries lower crime risk (48/100 vs 69/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Warrill View
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (12% vs 18%)
- has cheaper rent ($200/wk vs $300/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Warrill View
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (13/100 vs 0/100)
- has a shorter drive in (59 min vs 79 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (71.2 km vs 91.6 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Warrill View
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (13/100 vs 0/100)
- carries lower crime risk (48/100 vs 69/100)
- But Rosevale has more residents already 65 and over (23% vs 14%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Rosevale
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (1.9% vs -15.4%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Warrill View and Rosevale drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Rosevale rents higher ($300/wk vs $200/wk).
| Warrill View | Rosevale | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 203 | 212 +4% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -15.4% | +1.9% |
| Median age | 45 | 46 |
| Median household income | $86,632/yr | $86,112/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $200/wk | $300/wk +50% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.2%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.4%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.7%).
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Development activity
| Warrill View | Rosevale | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 524 across Scenic Rim same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +65% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Warrill View | Rosevale | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 60% of QLD same for both | |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 74% of QLD | Higher than 64% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 66% of QLD | Higher than 63% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 54% of QLD | Higher than 28% of QLD |
Liveability
Warrill View is more walkable (13 vs 0).
| Warrill View | Rosevale | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 | advantaged area decile 7/10 |
Risk profile
Rosevale carries more crime risk (69 vs 48).
| Warrill View | Rosevale | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 48/100 | Moderate 69/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Warrill View | Rosevale | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Warrill View
- Warrill View State School Government · Primary above peers
Schools in Rosevale
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Warrill View | Rosevale | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 1 same for both | |
| Waterways | 1 | 4 |
Mobility
Rosevale sits further from the CBD (91.6 km vs 71.2 km).
| Warrill View | Rosevale | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 13/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 71.2 km | 91.6 km +29% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 59 min | 79 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.6% postcode 4307 | 0.4% postcode 4340 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 93 postcode 4307 | 82 postcode 4340 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (64.0%).
Setting
| Warrill View | Rosevale | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 55 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 95 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Warrill View | Rosevale | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 | 20/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Satellite (Sky Muster) |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 94 premises | 0% 36 premises |
Climate
| Warrill View | Rosevale | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 897 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 31.3°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.1°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Warrill View | Rosevale | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.9 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.27 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Warrill View | Rosevale | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,689/yr same for both | |
| Council | Scenic Rim same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Warrill View | Rosevale | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Wright same for both | |
| Member | Scott Buchholz same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Warrill View | Rosevale | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Warrill View
Other comparisons with Rosevale
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.