Ward Belt vs Reeves Plains

Ward Belt is the younger of the two, with a median age of 45 against 48 in Reeves Plains. In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. Ward Belt is closer to the city centre: 49.1 km, against 57.5 km. On these figures, Ward Belt tends to suit couples.

Which one suits you?

There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.

Families with school-age kids

Ward Belt

ahead on the one thing that separates them

  • is already more of a family suburb (91% vs 79%)

Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.

First-home buyers

Too close to call

Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.

Weighs mortgage stress.

Renters

Reeves Plains

ahead on the one thing that separates them

  • has cheaper rent ($338/wk vs $425/wk)

Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.

Commuting to the city

Ward Belt

ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here

  • has a shorter drive in (40 min vs 50 min)
  • sits closer to the CBD (49.1 km vs 57.5 km)

Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.

Downsizers and retirees

Reeves Plains

ahead on the one thing that separates them

  • has more residents already 65 and over (26% vs 20%)

Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.

Investors

Too close to call

Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.

Weighs population growth.

Where they sit

Ward Belt and Reeves Plains drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.

Ward Belt Reeves Plains
Hides rows where both suburbs match

Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.

Side by side, out of 100

Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.

Ward Belt Reeves Plains
Walkability 0 / 0
Ward Belt — Walkability: 0/100 Reeves Plains — Walkability: 0/100
Safety 22 / 17
Ward Belt — Safety: 22/100 Reeves Plains — Safety: 17/100
Low fire risk 85 / 78
Ward Belt — Low fire risk: 85/100 Reeves Plains — Low fire risk: 78/100
Low flood risk 69 / 43
Ward Belt — Low flood risk: 69/100 Reeves Plains — Low flood risk: 43/100

Demographics

Ward Belt rents higher ($425/wk vs $338/wk); Reeves Plains skews older (48 vs 45).

Ward Belt Reeves Plains
Population 158
+18% vs other
129
Population trend (2016 → 2021) +2.6% -1.5%
Median age 45 48
Median household income $82,316/yr
+3% vs other
$80,184/yr
Median weekly rent $425/wk
+20% vs other
$338/wk

Age profile

Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.

Ward Belt Reeves Plains
0-4 — / 2.3%
Ward Belt — 0-4: not among its largest Reeves Plains — 0-4: 2.3%
5-14 17.7% / 8.5%
Ward Belt — 5-14: 17.7% Reeves Plains — 5-14: 8.5%
15-19 8.2% / 5.4%
Ward Belt — 15-19: 8.2% Reeves Plains — 15-19: 5.4%
20-24 — / 6.2%
Ward Belt — 20-24: not among its largest Reeves Plains — 20-24: 6.2%
25-34 11.4% / 10.1%
Ward Belt — 25-34: 11.4% Reeves Plains — 25-34: 10.1%
35-44 8.2% / 2.3%
Ward Belt — 35-44: 8.2% Reeves Plains — 35-44: 2.3%
45-54 17.1% / 21.7%
Ward Belt — 45-54: 17.1% Reeves Plains — 45-54: 21.7%
55-64 14.6% / 13.2%
Ward Belt — 55-64: 14.6% Reeves Plains — 55-64: 13.2%
65-74 14.6% / 17.1%
Ward Belt — 65-74: 14.6% Reeves Plains — 65-74: 17.1%
75-84 5.7% / 8.5%
Ward Belt — 75-84: 5.7% Reeves Plains — 75-84: 8.5%
85+ — / —
Ward Belt — 85+: not among its largest Reeves Plains — 85+: not among its largest

Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.7%).

Who lives together

Household composition, 2021 Census.

Ward Belt 67.6% couple families
Ward Belt — Couple Families: 67.6% Ward Belt — One Parent Families: 23.5% Ward Belt — Lone Person: 8.8% Ward Belt — Group Household: 0.0%
Reeves Plains 55.3% couple families
Reeves Plains — Couple Families: 55.3% Reeves Plains — One Parent Families: 23.7% Reeves Plains — Lone Person: 7.9% Reeves Plains — Group Household: 13.2%
Couple Families One Parent Families Lone Person Group Household

Who owns and who rents

Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.

Ward Belt 12.2% renting
Ward Belt — Owned Outright: 46.3% Ward Belt — Mortgage: 41.5% Ward Belt — Renting: 12.2%
Reeves Plains 13.5% renting
Reeves Plains — Owned Outright: 45.9% Reeves Plains — Mortgage: 40.5% Reeves Plains — Renting: 13.5%
Owned outright Mortgage Renting

Qualifications

Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.

Ward Belt Reeves Plains
Certificate III & IV 10.8% / 19.4%
Ward Belt — Certificate III & IV: 10.8% Reeves Plains — Certificate III & IV: 19.4%
Bachelor Degree 5.1% / 9.3%
Ward Belt — Bachelor Degree: 5.1% Reeves Plains — Bachelor Degree: 9.3%
Advanced Diploma / Diploma 7.0% / 4.7%
Ward Belt — Advanced Diploma / Diploma: 7.0% Reeves Plains — Advanced Diploma / Diploma: 4.7%

Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.4%).

Where residents were born

Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.

Ward Belt Reeves Plains
England 6.3% / 7.8%
Ward Belt — England: 6.3% Reeves Plains — England: 7.8%
Zimbabwe 3.8% / —
Ward Belt — Zimbabwe: 3.8% Reeves Plains — Zimbabwe: not among its largest
Netherlands 2.5% / —
Ward Belt — Netherlands: 2.5% Reeves Plains — Netherlands: not among its largest
Philippines — / 2.3%
Ward Belt — Philippines: not among its largest Reeves Plains — Philippines: 2.3%

Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (7.8%).

What people live in

Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.

Ward Belt 100.0% houses
Ward Belt — Houses: 100.0%
Reeves Plains 100.0% houses
Reeves Plains — Houses: 100.0%
Houses

Zoning mix

Ward Belt Reeves Plains
Rural and farming 97% 100%
Parks and recreation 3% 0%
Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09.

Development activity

Ward Belt Reeves Plains
New dwellings approved 278
across Light
106
across Adelaide Plains
Approvals change year on year +43% -21%

Ranking within SA

Ward Belt Reeves Plains
House price —
same for both
Income Higher than 58% of SA Higher than 55% of SA
Schools —
same for both
Walkability Higher than 21% of SA Higher than 24% of SA
Affordability —
same for both
EV adoption Higher than 57% of SA Higher than 51% of SA
NBN connectivity Higher than 71% of SA Higher than 58% of SA

Liveability

Ward Belt Reeves Plains
Grade —
same for both
Score —
same for both
Socio-economic band below-average income
decile 3/10
mid-range socio-economic
decile 5/10

Risk profile

Reeves Plains carries more flood risk (57 vs 31).

Ward Belt Reeves Plains
Bushfire Low
15/100
Low
22/100
Crime High
78/100
High
83/100
Flood Low
31/100
Moderate
57/100
Coastal erosion None
0/100
same for both
Aircraft noise None
0/100
same for both
Industrial facilities nearby 1
within 5 km
same for both

Schools

Ward Belt Reeves Plains
Inside the suburb 0
same for both
Rated above peers 0
same for both
Rated at peers 0
same for both
Rated below peers 0
same for both

Amenities in the suburb

Ward Belt Reeves Plains
Parks & reserves 0 1

Mobility

Reeves Plains sits further from the CBD (57.5 km vs 49.1 km).

Ward Belt Reeves Plains
Walkability score 0/100
same for both
Distance to Adelaide 49.1 km 57.5 km
+17% vs other
Drive time (normal traffic) 40 min 50 min
Electric vehicle share 0.6%
postcode 5118
0.5%
postcode 5502
Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings 76
postcode 5118
78
postcode 5502

How people get to work

Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.

Ward Belt Reeves Plains
Car (driver) 75.4% / 83.0%
Ward Belt — Car (driver): 75.4% Reeves Plains — Car (driver): 83.0%
Worked from Home 13.0% / 17.0%
Ward Belt — Worked from Home: 13.0% Reeves Plains — Worked from Home: 17.0%
Car (passenger) 11.6% / —
Ward Belt — Car (passenger): 11.6% Reeves Plains — Car (passenger): not among its largest

Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (83.0%).

Setting

Ward Belt Reeves Plains
Elevation 43 m
above sea level, at the suburb centre
33 m
above sea level, at the suburb centre
Distance to the ocean 21.6 km 19.2 km

NBN connectivity

Ward Belt Reeves Plains
Connectivity score 37/100 30/100
Most common technology Fixed wireless
same for both
Full-fibre (FTTP) share 8%
66 premises
0%
61 premises

Climate

Ward Belt Reeves Plains
Annual rainfall 404 mm
same for both
Summer max (Jan) 30.0°C
same for both
Winter min (Jul) 6.6°C
same for both

Air quality (annual mean)

Ward Belt Reeves Plains
PM2.5 5.5 µg/m³
same for both
PM10 18.7 µg/m³
same for both
NO₂ 0.31 pphm
same for both

Council rates

Ward Belt Reeves Plains
Average residential rate $2,297/yr $2,698/yr
Council Light Adelaide Plains

Federal electorate

Ward Belt Reeves Plains
Division Grey
same for both
Member Tom Venning
same for both
Party Liberal
same for both

First Home Owner Grant

Ward Belt Reeves Plains
Grant amount $15,000
same for both
Property price cap —
same for both
Eligibility New
same for both

Tags

Ward Belt

Reeves Plains

More comparisons

Other comparisons with Ward Belt

Other comparisons with Reeves Plains

Full data on Ward Belt Full data on Reeves Plains
Unlock full address-level data — $29/month

Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.

Save this page for later

We'll email you a link to this page so you can finish reading it on any device. We use your address once to send it and don't keep it.

or