Wang Wauk vs Bunyah
Wang Wauk is the younger of the two, with a median age of 52 against 56 in Bunyah. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Bunyah, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Bunyah: a median of $1.08 million, against $800,000 in Wang Wauk, though rent is higher in Wang Wauk. On these figures, Wang Wauk tends to suit families with children and buyers on a tighter budget, while Bunyah suits people living alone and couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Too close to call
Nothing among the 6 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 2 things we measure here
- Wang Wauk has cheaper houses ($800,000 vs $1,085,000)
- Bunyah leaves households under less mortgage stress (19% vs 28%)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Bunyah
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper rent ($316/wk vs $380/wk)
- leaves renters under less rental stress (26% vs 32%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Too close to call
Nothing among the 4 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Wang Wauk
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (12.6% vs -7.1%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Wang Wauk and Bunyah drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Bunyah has more residents (130 vs 98); Wang Wauk rents higher ($380/wk vs $316/wk).
| Wang Wauk | Bunyah | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 98 | 130 +33% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +12.6% | -7.1% |
| Median age | 52 | 56 |
| Median household income | $62,816/yr same for both | |
| Median weekly rent | $380/wk +17% vs other | $316/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.4%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (6.1%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.5%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Wang Wauk | Bunyah | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $800,000 | $1,085,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $692,500 |
Zoning mix
Bunyah has more rural and farming land (100% vs 83%); Wang Wauk has more land zoned for conservation (16% vs 0%).
| Wang Wauk | Bunyah | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 83% | 100% |
| Environmental | 16% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Wang Wauk | Bunyah | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 743 across Mid-Coast same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +327% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Wang Wauk | Bunyah | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 33% of NSW | Higher than 56% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 25% of NSW same for both | |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 15% of NSW | Higher than 32% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 46% of NSW | Higher than 25% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 33% of NSW | Higher than 25% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 53% of NSW | Higher than 38% of NSW |
Liveability
| Wang Wauk | Bunyah | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Bunyah carries more bushfire risk (74 vs 56).
| Wang Wauk | Bunyah | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 56/100 | High 74/100 |
| Crime | High 72/100 | High 75/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Wang Wauk | Bunyah | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Wang Wauk | Bunyah | |
|---|---|---|
| Waterways | 14 | 43 |
Mobility
| Wang Wauk | Bunyah | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Sydney | 283.3 km | 283.6 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 205 min | 203 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.3% postcode 2423 | 0.2% postcode 2429 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 61 postcode 2423 | 62 postcode 2429 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (63.0%).
Setting
| Wang Wauk | Bunyah | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 64 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 105 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 20.8 km | 28.2 km |
NBN connectivity
| Wang Wauk | Bunyah | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 | 26/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 64 premises | 0% 94 premises |
Climate
| Wang Wauk | Bunyah | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,331 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Wang Wauk | Bunyah | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,560/yr same for both | |
| Council | Mid-Coast same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Wang Wauk | Bunyah | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Lyne same for both | |
| Member | Alison Penfold same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Wang Wauk | Bunyah | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Wang Wauk
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Wang Wauk
Other comparisons with Bunyah
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.