Walkerville vs Fish Creek
Fish Creek is the younger of the two, with a median age of 51 against 57 in Walkerville. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Walkerville, about half of households are people living alone. Houses cost more in Fish Creek: a median of $653,000, against $378,000 in Walkerville, though rent is higher in Walkerville. On these figures, Walkerville tends to suit people living alone and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Walkerville
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (28/100 vs 55/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 2 things we measure here
- Walkerville has cheaper houses ($377,500 vs $652,750)
- Fish Creek leaves households under less mortgage stress (25% vs 33%)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Fish Creek
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (18% vs 43%)
- has cheaper rent ($235/wk vs $458/wk)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
Fish Creek
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (137 min vs 156 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (173.6 km vs 187.4 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Walkerville
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (28/100 vs 55/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Walkerville
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (54.8% vs 3.7%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Walkerville and Fish Creek drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Fish Creek has more residents (858 vs 130); Walkerville rents higher ($458/wk vs $235/wk).
| Walkerville | Fish Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 130 | 858 +560% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +54.8% | +3.7% |
| Median age | 57 | 51 |
| Median household income | $55,224/yr | $66,612/yr +21% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $458/wk +49% vs other | $235/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.1%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.0%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.5%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Walkerville | Fish Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $377,500 | $652,750 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $1,075,000 |
Zoning mix
Fish Creek has more rural and farming land (96% vs 65%).
| Walkerville | Fish Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 65% | 96% |
| Parks and recreation | 33% | 3% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 1% same for both | |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Walkerville | Fish Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 170 across South Gippsland same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +21% same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| Walkerville | Fish Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 14% of VIC | Higher than 27% of VIC |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 51% of VIC | Higher than 17% of VIC |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 63% of VIC | Higher than 73% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 13% of VIC | Higher than 40% of VIC |
Liveability
| Walkerville | Fish Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | B |
| Score | — | 52/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 9/10 | advantaged area decile 7/10 |
Risk profile
Fish Creek carries more flood risk (23 vs 0); Fish Creek carries more crime risk (55 vs 28).
| Walkerville | Fish Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Low 28/100 | Moderate 55/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 | Low 23/100 |
| Coastal erosion | Moderate 40/100 | None 0/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Walkerville | Fish Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Walkerville
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Fish Creek
- Fish Creek and District Primary School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Walkerville | Fish Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 2 |
| Childcare | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 3 | 4 |
Mobility
Walkerville sits further from the CBD (187.4 km vs 173.6 km).
| Walkerville | Fish Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Melbourne | 187.4 km +7% vs other | 173.6 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 156 min | 137 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.6% postcode 3956 | 0.9% postcode 3959 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 36 postcode 3956 | 42 postcode 3959 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (57.4%).
Setting
| Walkerville | Fish Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 91 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 77 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 2.4 km | 9.3 km |
NBN connectivity
| Walkerville | Fish Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 16/100 | 29/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 71 premises | 0% 492 premises |
Climate
| Walkerville | Fish Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 906 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 24.6°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.9°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Walkerville | Fish Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,282/yr same for both | |
| Council | South Gippsland same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Walkerville | Fish Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Monash same for both | |
| Member | Mary Aldred same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Walkerville | Fish Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Walkerville
Other comparisons with Fish Creek
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.