Walang vs Yetholme
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Walang, most households are couple families. In Yetholme, about half of households are couple families. On these figures, Walang tends to suit families with children and couples, while Yetholme suits people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Walang
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (35/100 vs 58/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (77% vs 62%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Walang
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (9% vs 25%)
- has cheaper rent ($208/wk vs $365/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Walang
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (35/100 vs 58/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Walang
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (29.8% vs -0.8%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Walang and Yetholme drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Yetholme has more residents (241 vs 109); Yetholme rents higher ($365/wk vs $208/wk).
| Walang | Yetholme | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 109 | 241 +121% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +29.8% | -0.8% |
| Median age | 46 | 48 |
| Median household income | $124,748/yr +39% vs other | $76,024/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $208/wk | $365/wk +75% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.1%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (2.9%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.5%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Walang | Yetholme | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,050,000 | $990,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 47 days from 4 sales |
Zoning mix
Yetholme has more land zoned for conservation (10% vs 0%).
| Walang | Yetholme | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 98% | 89% |
| Environmental | 0% | 10% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 2% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Walang | Yetholme | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 177 across Bathurst same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -23% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Walang | Yetholme | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 54% of NSW | Higher than 42% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 86% of NSW | Higher than 44% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 50% of NSW | Higher than 34% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 76% of NSW | Higher than 52% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 43% of NSW | Higher than 44% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 53% of NSW | Higher than 60% of NSW |
Liveability
| Walang | Yetholme | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 |
Risk profile
Yetholme carries more crime risk (58 vs 35).
| Walang | Yetholme | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 23/100 | Low 26/100 |
| Crime | Low 35/100 | Moderate 58/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Walang | Yetholme | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Walang | Yetholme | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 5 | 9 |
Mobility
| Walang | Yetholme | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 6/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 189.3 km | 187.5 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 164 min same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.4% postcode 2795 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 47 postcode 2795 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (83.3%).
Setting
| Walang | Yetholme | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 958 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 1,239 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Walang | Yetholme | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 46 premises | 0% 107 premises |
Climate
| Walang | Yetholme | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 644 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.4°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 1.2°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Walang | Yetholme | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | — same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Walang | Yetholme | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,301/yr same for both | |
| Council | Bathurst same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Walang | Yetholme | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Calare same for both | |
| Member | Andrew Gee same for both | |
| Party | Independent same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Walang | Yetholme | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Walang
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Walang
Other comparisons with Yetholme
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.