Wairewa vs Bete Bolong
In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are people living alone. On these figures, Wairewa tends to suit people living alone, while Bete Bolong suits families with children.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Bete Bolong
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (21/100 vs 51/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (44% vs 32%)
- But Wairewa has more separate houses rather than flats (111% vs 100%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Wairewa
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (21% vs 32%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Bete Bolong
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (8% vs 17%)
- has cheaper rent ($125/wk vs $150/wk)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
Wairewa
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (259 min vs 288 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (347.7 km vs 373 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Bete Bolong
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (21/100 vs 51/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Bete Bolong
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (-9.7% vs -23.0%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Wairewa and Bete Bolong drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Bete Bolong has higher household incomes ($81,224 vs $46,020); Bete Bolong has more residents (84 vs 67).
| Wairewa | Bete Bolong | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67 | 84 +25% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -23.0% | -9.7% |
| Median age | 53 | 55 |
| Median household income | $46,020/yr | $81,224/yr +76% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $150/wk +17% vs other | $125/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.4%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (7.5%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (14.3%).
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Zoning mix
| Wairewa | Bete Bolong | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks and recreation | 73% | 79% |
| Rural and farming | 26% | 21% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Wairewa | Bete Bolong | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 386 across East Gippsland same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +50% same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| Wairewa | Bete Bolong | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 6% of VIC | Higher than 49% of VIC |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 13% of VIC | Higher than 44% of VIC |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | — | Higher than 21% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 3% of VIC | Higher than 36% of VIC |
Liveability
| Wairewa | Bete Bolong | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Bete Bolong carries more flood risk (55 vs 0); Wairewa carries more crime risk (51 vs 21).
| Wairewa | Bete Bolong | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 96/100 | High 94/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 51/100 | Low 21/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 | Moderate 55/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Wairewa | Bete Bolong | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Wairewa | Bete Bolong | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 5 | 1 |
Mobility
Bete Bolong sits further from the CBD (373 km vs 347.7 km).
| Wairewa | Bete Bolong | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Melbourne | 347.7 km | 373 km +7% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 259 min | 288 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.0% postcode 3887 | 0.3% postcode 3888 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 79 postcode 3887 | 42 postcode 3888 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (65.2%).
Setting
| Wairewa | Bete Bolong | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 85 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 121 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 15.4 km | 13.7 km |
NBN connectivity
| Wairewa | Bete Bolong | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 15/100 | 28/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 14 premises | 0% 44 premises |
Council rates
| Wairewa | Bete Bolong | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,807/yr same for both | |
| Council | East Gippsland same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Wairewa | Bete Bolong | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Gippsland same for both | |
| Member | Darren Chester same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Wairewa | Bete Bolong | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Wairewa
Other comparisons with Bete Bolong
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.