Vale Park vs Manningham
Manningham is the younger of the two, with a median age of 39 against 42 in Vale Park. In both, most households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Vale Park: a median of $1.4 million, against $1.2 million in Manningham, and rent is higher there too.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Vale Park has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
- Manningham carries lower crime risk (30/100 vs 53/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Manningham
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- has cheaper units ($578,000 vs $700,000)
- has cheaper houses ($1,195,000 vs $1,400,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Manningham
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($320/wk vs $410/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Manningham
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (78/100 vs 60/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Manningham
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (30/100 vs 53/100)
- is more walkable (78/100 vs 60/100)
- But Vale Park has more residents already 65 and over (22% vs 16%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Vale Park and Manningham drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Vale Park has more residents (2,452 vs 1,391); Vale Park rents higher ($410/wk vs $320/wk).
| Vale Park | Manningham | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,452 +43% vs other | 1,391 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +9.2% | +5.0% |
| Median age | 42 | 39 |
| Median household income | $105,612/yr +3% vs other | $102,492/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $410/wk +22% vs other | $320/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (14.7%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.9%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.9%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Vale Park | Manningham | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,400,000 | $1,195,000 |
| Median unit price | $700,000 | $578,000 |
| Median land price | $1,020,000 | $1,020,500 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 25 days from 12 sales | 48 days from 8 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
22 vs 12 sales
13 vs 6 sales
Zoning mix
| Vale Park | Manningham | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 87% | 99% |
| Parks and recreation | 8% | 0% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 3% | 0% |
| Commercial | 2% | 1% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Vale Park | Manningham | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 27 across Walkerville | 1,176 across Port Adelaide Enfield |
| Approvals change year on year | -50% | +23% |
Gross rental yield
| Vale Park | Manningham | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.2% $798/wk on $1.31M | — |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within SA
| Vale Park | Manningham | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 74% of SA | Higher than 54% of SA |
| Income | Higher than 83% of SA | Higher than 81% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 84% of SA | Higher than 91% of SA |
| Affordability | Higher than 45% of SA | Higher than 73% of SA |
| EV adoption | Higher than 99% of SA | Higher than 72% of SA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 98% of SA | Higher than 97% of SA |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 19% of SA | — |
Liveability
Manningham is more walkable (78 vs 60); Manningham scores higher overall (80 vs 74).
| Vale Park | Manningham | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A same for both | |
| Score | 74/100 | 80/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 | very advantaged area decile 9/10 |
Risk profile
Vale Park carries more crime risk (53 vs 30).
| Vale Park | Manningham | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 53/100 | Low 30/100 |
| Flood | Moderate 51/100 | Moderate 53/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | Moderate 50/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 4 within 5 km | 13 within 5 km |
Schools
| Vale Park | Manningham | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 Adelaide University, Magill Campus, 5.1 km | 3 Adelaide University, Adelaide City Campus, 6.0 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 3.5% same for both | |
Schools in Vale Park
- Vale Park Primary School Government · Primary above peers
Schools in Manningham
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Vale Park | Manningham | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 1 |
| Childcare | 2 | 1 |
Mobility
| Vale Park | Manningham | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 60/100 | 78/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 6.9 km | 7 km +1% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 13 min same for both | |
| Public transport score | 78/100 Bus | 79/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 45.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 30.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 2.8% postcode 5081 | 0.8% postcode 5086 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 53 postcode 5081 | 63 postcode 5086 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (72.2%).
Setting
| Vale Park | Manningham | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 45 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 62 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 11.2 km | 10.2 km |
NBN connectivity
| Vale Park | Manningham | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 95/100 | 93/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 73% 1,102 premises | 63% 609 premises |
Climate
| Vale Park | Manningham | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 457 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 29.1°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 8.5°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Vale Park | Manningham | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | — same for both | |
| PM10 | — same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.51 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Vale Park | Manningham | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,674/yr | $1,311/yr |
| Council | Walkerville | Port Adelaide Enfield |
Federal electorate
| Vale Park | Manningham | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Adelaide same for both | |
| Member | Steve Georganas same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Vale Park | Manningham | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Vale Park
Manningham
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Vale Park
Other comparisons with Manningham
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.