Upper Pilton vs Forest Springs
In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. On these figures, Upper Pilton tends to suit couples, while Forest Springs suits people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Upper Pilton
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (14/100 vs 37/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (79% vs 70%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Forest Springs
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (20% vs 31%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Upper Pilton
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($0/wk vs $603/wk)
Weighs rent.
Commuting to the city
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Upper Pilton
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (14/100 vs 37/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (25% vs 17%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Forest Springs
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (50.7% vs 27.0%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Upper Pilton and Forest Springs drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Forest Springs rents higher ($603/wk vs $0/wk); Forest Springs has more residents (104 vs 80).
| Upper Pilton | Forest Springs | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 80 | 104 +30% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +27.0% | +50.7% |
| Median age | 48 | 50 |
| Median household income | $76,336/yr | $80,132/yr +5% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | — | $603/wk (not reported on the other side) |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.1%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.2%).
Development activity
| Upper Pilton | Forest Springs | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,513 across Toowoomba | 291 across Southern Downs |
| Approvals change year on year | -25% | +63% |
Ranking within QLD
| Upper Pilton | Forest Springs | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 47% of QLD | Higher than 50% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 66% of QLD | Higher than 41% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 8% of QLD | Higher than 16% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 28% of QLD | Higher than 36% of QLD |
Liveability
| Upper Pilton | Forest Springs | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Upper Pilton carries more bushfire risk (55 vs 0); Forest Springs carries more crime risk (37 vs 14).
| Upper Pilton | Forest Springs | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 55/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | Low 14/100 | Low 37/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Upper Pilton | Forest Springs | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Upper Pilton | Forest Springs | |
|---|---|---|
| Waterways | 1 same for both | |
Mobility
| Upper Pilton | Forest Springs | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Brisbane | 155 km | 153.9 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 130 min | 133 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.1% postcode 4361 | 0.2% postcode 4362 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 66 postcode 4361 | 67 postcode 4362 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (66.7%).
Setting
| Upper Pilton | Forest Springs | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 627 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 532 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Upper Pilton | Forest Springs | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 20/100 | 27/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 20 premises | 0% 32 premises |
Climate
| Upper Pilton | Forest Springs | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 643 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Upper Pilton | Forest Springs | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,618/yr | $1,627/yr |
| Council | Toowoomba | Southern Downs |
Federal electorate
| Upper Pilton | Forest Springs | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Maranoa same for both | |
| Member | David Littleproud same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Upper Pilton | Forest Springs | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Upper Pilton
Forest Springs
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Upper Pilton
Other comparisons with Forest Springs
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.