Upper Manilla vs Woodsreef
Woodsreef is the younger of the two, with a median age of 38 against 53 in Upper Manilla. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Upper Manilla, about half of households are people living alone. In Woodsreef, most households are people living alone. On these figures, Upper Manilla tends to suit older residents, while Woodsreef suits people living alone and families with children.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Upper Manilla
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (50/100 vs 83/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (50% vs 38%)
- But Woodsreef has more separate houses rather than flats (100% vs 90%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Upper Manilla
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (30% vs 40%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Upper Manilla
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (9% vs 22%)
- has cheaper rent ($150/wk vs $240/wk)
- But Woodsreef has a bigger rental market to choose from (33% vs 13%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Upper Manilla
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (344 min vs 381 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (468.8 km vs 511.8 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Upper Manilla
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- has more residents already 65 and over (28% vs 14%)
- carries lower crime risk (50/100 vs 83/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Upper Manilla and Woodsreef drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Upper Manilla has more residents (105 vs 59); Woodsreef rents higher ($240/wk vs $150/wk).
| Upper Manilla | Woodsreef | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 105 +44% vs other | 59 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -15.3% | -14.5% |
| Median age | 53 | 38 |
| Median household income | $86,632/yr +35% vs other | $56,316/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $150/wk | $240/wk +60% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.9%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.1%).
Zoning mix
| Upper Manilla | Woodsreef | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 99% | 98% |
| Environmental | 1% | 2% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Upper Manilla | Woodsreef | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 390 across Tamworth same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -35% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Upper Manilla | Woodsreef | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 55% of NSW | Higher than 16% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 15% of NSW | Higher than 9% of NSW |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 5% of NSW | — |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 39% of NSW | Higher than 5% of NSW |
Liveability
| Upper Manilla | Woodsreef | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 |
Risk profile
Woodsreef carries more bushfire risk (48 vs 25); Woodsreef carries more crime risk (83 vs 50).
| Upper Manilla | Woodsreef | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 25/100 | Moderate 48/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 50/100 | High 83/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Upper Manilla | Woodsreef | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Upper Manilla | Woodsreef | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 2 |
| Waterways | 4 | 11 |
Mobility
Woodsreef sits further from the CBD (511.8 km vs 468.8 km).
| Upper Manilla | Woodsreef | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Sydney | 468.8 km | 511.8 km +9% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 344 min | 381 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.1% postcode 2346 | 0.0% postcode 2347 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 50 postcode 2346 | 43 postcode 2347 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (61.9%).
Setting
| Upper Manilla | Woodsreef | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 484 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 657 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Upper Manilla | Woodsreef | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 27/100 | 15/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Satellite (Sky Muster) |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 37 premises | 0% 18 premises |
Climate
| Upper Manilla | Woodsreef | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 679 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 32.0°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 0.9°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Upper Manilla | Woodsreef | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,397/yr same for both | |
| Council | Tamworth same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Upper Manilla | Woodsreef | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | New England same for both | |
| Member | Barnaby Joyce same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Upper Manilla | Woodsreef | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Upper Manilla
Other comparisons with Woodsreef
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.