Upper Burringbar vs Chowan Creek
Upper Burringbar is the younger of the two, with a median age of 49 against 59 in Chowan Creek. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Upper Burringbar, about half of households are people living alone. In Chowan Creek, the large majority of households are people living alone. On these figures, Chowan Creek tends to suit people living alone and older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Upper Burringbar
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (20/100 vs 95/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, and childcare.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Chowan Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($320/wk vs $350/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Upper Burringbar
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (10/100 vs 0/100)
- has a shorter drive in (515 min vs 539 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (784.7 km vs 807 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Upper Burringbar
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (10/100 vs 0/100)
- carries lower crime risk (20/100 vs 95/100)
- But Chowan Creek has more residents already 65 and over (42% vs 24%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Chowan Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (54.1% vs 3.6%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Upper Burringbar and Chowan Creek drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Upper Burringbar has more residents (289 vs 57); Chowan Creek skews older (59 vs 49).
| Upper Burringbar | Chowan Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 289 +80% vs other | 57 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +3.6% | +54.1% |
| Median age | 49 | 59 |
| Median household income | $54,184/yr +17% vs other | $45,032/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $350/wk +9% vs other | $320/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (35.1%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (14.5%).
Property market
| Upper Burringbar | Chowan Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,650,000 | — |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Zoning mix
Chowan Creek has more land zoned for conservation (43% vs 1%); Upper Burringbar has more rural and farming land (79% vs 57%).
| Upper Burringbar | Chowan Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 79% | 57% |
| Environmental | 1% | 43% |
| Other and special use | 21% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Upper Burringbar | Chowan Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 331 across Tweed same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -50% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Upper Burringbar | Chowan Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 50% of NSW | — |
| Income | Higher than 14% of NSW | Higher than 7% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 57% of NSW | Higher than 30% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 21% of NSW | — |
| EV adoption | Higher than 85% of NSW | Higher than 65% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 29% of NSW same for both | |
Liveability
Upper Burringbar is more walkable (10 vs 0).
| Upper Burringbar | Chowan Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 3/10 | below-average income decile 2/10 |
Risk profile
Chowan Creek carries more crime risk (95 vs 20); Upper Burringbar carries more bushfire risk (71 vs 50).
| Upper Burringbar | Chowan Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 71/100 | Moderate 50/100 |
| Crime | Low 20/100 | High 95/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Upper Burringbar | Chowan Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Upper Burringbar | Chowan Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Waterways | 3 | 2 |
Mobility
Chowan Creek sits further from the CBD (807 km vs 784.7 km).
| Upper Burringbar | Chowan Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 10/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 784.7 km | 807 km +3% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 515 min | 539 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.2% postcode 2483 | 0.6% postcode 2484 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 72 postcode 2483 | 76 postcode 2484 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (72.4%).
Setting
| Upper Burringbar | Chowan Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 116 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 81 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 12.9 km | 17.6 km |
NBN connectivity
| Upper Burringbar | Chowan Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 20/100 | 19/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 136 premises | 0% 28 premises |
Climate
| Upper Burringbar | Chowan Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,569 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 29.1°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 9.1°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Upper Burringbar | Chowan Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,745/yr same for both | |
| Council | Tweed same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Upper Burringbar | Chowan Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Richmond same for both | |
| Member | Justine Elliot same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Upper Burringbar | Chowan Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Upper Burringbar
Chowan Creek
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Upper Burringbar
Other comparisons with Chowan Creek
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.