Tusmore vs Hazelwood Park
In both, the large majority of households own their home, most homes are detached houses, and about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Tusmore: a median of $2.36 million, against $1.85 million in Hazelwood Park. On these figures, Hazelwood Park tends to suit families with children and buyers on a tighter budget.
Tusmore and Hazelwood Park are affluent Adelaide suburbs with comparable household incomes around $119,500 annually, but they differ notably in property values and safety perception. Tusmore commands significantly higher prices—median houses at $2,360,000 versus $1,795,500, and units at $740,000 versus $610,000—while sitting slightly closer to the CBD at 5.8 km. Hazelwood Park scores higher on liveability (91 versus 87) and walkability (82 versus 79), and has a lower crime risk rating of 27 compared to Tusmore's 38. Both are low-risk for bushfire and flood, making the choice largely between Tusmore's premium positioning and proximity, or Hazelwood Park's stronger community amenity and safety metrics at a lower entry price.
Written by an AI language model from the figures below. Every number in it is checked against those figures before it is published.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Hazelwood Park
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (7 vs 2)
- carries lower crime risk (27/100 vs 47/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Hazelwood Park
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper houses ($1,850,000 vs $2,360,000)
- has cheaper units ($610,000 vs $740,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Hazelwood Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (27/100 vs 47/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Tusmore and Hazelwood Park drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Hazelwood Park has more residents (1,953 vs 1,503); Tusmore skews older (45 vs 43).
| Tusmore | Hazelwood Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,503 | 1,953 +30% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +3.7% | +4.2% |
| Median age | 45 | 43 |
| Median household income | $119,496/yr | $119,600/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $360/wk +4% vs other | $345/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (26.9%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (6.7%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Tusmore | Hazelwood Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2,360,000 | $1,850,000 |
| Median unit price | $740,000 | $610,000 |
| Median land price | — | $820,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 25 days from 10 sales | 22 days from 18 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
12 vs 22 sales
9 vs 17 sales
Zoning mix
| Tusmore | Hazelwood Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 95% | 98% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 3% | 0% |
| Commercial | 2% same for both | |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Tusmore | Hazelwood Park | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 250 across Burnside same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +32% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Tusmore | Hazelwood Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — same for both | |
| Units | — | 4.5% $590/wk on $675K |
Ranking within SA
| Tusmore | Hazelwood Park | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 90% of SA | Higher than 81% of SA |
| Income | Higher than 92% of SA same for both | |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 92% of SA | Higher than 94% of SA |
| Affordability | Higher than 25% of SA | Higher than 49% of SA |
| EV adoption | Higher than 96% of SA | Higher than 99% of SA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 87% of SA | Higher than 84% of SA |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 51% of SA |
Liveability
| Tusmore | Hazelwood Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A same for both | |
| Score | 79/100 | 82/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Tusmore carries more crime risk (47 vs 27); Hazelwood Park carries more flood risk (81 vs 65).
| Tusmore | Hazelwood Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 47/100 | Low 27/100 |
| Flood | Moderate 65/100 | High 81/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 4 within 5 km | 3 within 5 km |
Schools
| Tusmore | Hazelwood Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 Adelaide University, Magill Campus, 3.9 km | 3 Adelaide University, Magill Campus, 3.8 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 4.6% | 3.5% |
Amenities in the suburb
| Tusmore | Hazelwood Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 4 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 7 |
| Childcare | 1 same for both | |
| GPs | 1 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 1 |
| EV chargers | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 1 | 5 |
Mobility
| Tusmore | Hazelwood Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 79/100 | 82/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 5.8 km | 6.3 km +9% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 11 min same for both | |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus | 76/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 37.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 29.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 2.4% postcode 5065 | 2.8% postcode 5066 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 49 postcode 5065 | 66 postcode 5066 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (68.3%).
Setting
| Tusmore | Hazelwood Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 99 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 115 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 13.0 km | 13.7 km |
NBN connectivity
| Tusmore | Hazelwood Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 75/100 | 72/100 |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial | Fibre to the node |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 657 premises | 31% 920 premises |
Climate
| Tusmore | Hazelwood Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 457 mm | 969 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | 29.1°C | 23.8°C |
| Winter min (Jul) | 8.5°C | 5.4°C |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Tusmore | Hazelwood Park | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 1.12 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Tusmore | Hazelwood Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,410/yr same for both | |
| Council | Burnside same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Tusmore | Hazelwood Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Sturt same for both | |
| Member | Claire Clutterham same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Tusmore | Hazelwood Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Tusmore
Hazelwood Park
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Tusmore
Other comparisons with Hazelwood Park
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.