Tunnack vs Woodsdale
Tunnack is the younger of the two, with a median age of 46 against 56 in Woodsdale. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Tunnack, most households are people living alone. In Woodsdale, about half of households are people living alone. On these figures, Woodsdale tends to suit families with children.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Tunnack
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (4 vs 1)
- is already more of a family suburb (42% vs 33%)
Weighs schools, house stock, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Woodsdale
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (13% vs 18%)
- has cheaper rent ($150/wk vs $200/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Woodsdale
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more residents already 65 and over (25% vs 18%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, and walkability.
Investors
Tunnack
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (19.1% vs 2.4%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Tunnack and Woodsdale drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Tunnack has more residents (212 vs 84); Tunnack rents higher ($200/wk vs $150/wk).
| Tunnack | Woodsdale | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 212 +60% vs other | 84 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +19.1% | +2.4% |
| Median age | 46 | 56 |
| Median household income | $56,316/yr | $61,048/yr +8% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $200/wk +25% vs other | $150/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (32.1%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.2%).
Zoning mix
| Tunnack | Woodsdale | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 92% | 95% |
| Environmental | 8% | 5% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Tunnack | Woodsdale | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 45 across Southern Midlands same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +33% same for both | |
Ranking within TAS
| Tunnack | Woodsdale | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 29% of TAS | Higher than 37% of TAS |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 21% of TAS | Higher than 8% of TAS |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 12% of TAS | Higher than 11% of TAS |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 5% of TAS | Higher than 2% of TAS |
Liveability
| Tunnack | Woodsdale | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | high-need area decile 1/10 | below-average income decile 3/10 |
Risk profile
Woodsdale carries more bushfire risk (87 vs 57).
| Tunnack | Woodsdale | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 57/100 | High 87/100 |
| Crime | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Tunnack | Woodsdale | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Tunnack | Woodsdale | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 1 |
| Waterways | 0 | 4 |
Mobility
| Tunnack | Woodsdale | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Hobart | 67.7 km | 68 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 67 min same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.3% postcode 7120 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 24 postcode 7120 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (83.6%).
Setting
| Tunnack | Woodsdale | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 471 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 360 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 33.0 km | 24.2 km |
NBN connectivity
| Tunnack | Woodsdale | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 15/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 46 premises | 0% 36 premises |
Climate
| Tunnack | Woodsdale | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 493 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Tunnack | Woodsdale | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,381/yr same for both | |
| Council | Southern Midlands same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Tunnack | Woodsdale | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Lyons same for both | |
| Member | Rebecca White same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Tunnack | Woodsdale | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $20,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Tunnack
Other comparisons with Woodsdale
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.