Tulloona vs Garah
Garah is the younger of the two, with a median age of 44 against 54 in Tulloona. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Tulloona, the large majority of households are couple families. On these figures, Tulloona tends to suit young adults and couples, while Garah suits older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Garah
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (3 vs 0)
- carries lower crime risk (48/100 vs 70/100)
- But Tulloona is already more of a family suburb (100% vs 49%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
Renters
Tulloona
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($0/wk vs $240/wk)
Weighs rent.
Commuting to the city
Garah
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- sits closer to the CBD (693.3 km vs 699.2 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Garah
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- has more residents already 65 and over (27% vs 17%)
- carries lower crime risk (48/100 vs 70/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Tulloona
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (18.0% vs -4.9%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Tulloona and Garah drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Garah rents higher ($240/wk vs $0/wk); Garah has more residents (291 vs 59).
| Tulloona | Garah | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 59 | 291 +393% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +18.0% | -4.9% |
| Median age | 54 | 44 |
| Median household income | $77,948/yr +10% vs other | $69,836/yr |
| Median weekly rent | — | $240/wk (not reported on the other side) |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (30.5%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (13.6%).
Property market
| Tulloona | Garah | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $133,500 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Zoning mix
| Tulloona | Garah | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 100% same for both | |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Tulloona | Garah | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 11 across Moree Plains same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -100% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Tulloona | Garah | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — | Higher than 2% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 46% of NSW | Higher than 33% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 28% of NSW | Higher than 1% of NSW |
| Affordability | — | Higher than 98% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 1% of NSW | — |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 15% of NSW | Higher than 1% of NSW |
Liveability
| Tulloona | Garah | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 |
Risk profile
Garah carries more bushfire risk (28 vs 17); Tulloona carries more crime risk (70 vs 48).
| Tulloona | Garah | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 17/100 | Low 28/100 |
| Crime | High 70/100 | Moderate 48/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Tulloona | Garah | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Tulloona
- Tulloona Public School Government · Primary
Schools in Garah
- Garah Public School Government · Primary
Amenities in the suburb
| Tulloona | Garah | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 3 |
| Police stations | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 4 | 15 |
Mobility
Tulloona sits further from the CBD (699.2 km vs 693.3 km).
| Tulloona | Garah | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Sydney | 699.2 km | 693.3 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 489 min | 491 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.0% postcode 2400 | 0.0% postcode 2405 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 78 postcode 2400 | 61 postcode 2405 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (56.8%).
Setting
| Tulloona | Garah | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 220 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 181 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Tulloona | Garah | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 15/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 10 premises | 0% 62 premises |
Council rates
| Tulloona | Garah | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,249/yr same for both | |
| Council | Moree Plains same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Tulloona | Garah | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Parkes same for both | |
| Member | Jamie Chaffey same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Tulloona | Garah | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Tulloona
Garah
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Tulloona
Other comparisons with Garah
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.