Tonsley vs Mitchell Park
Tonsley is the younger of the two, with a median age of 31 against 37 in Mitchell Park. In Tonsley, most households own their home and most households are people living alone. In Mitchell Park, about half of households rent and about half of households are people living alone. Houses cost more in Mitchell Park: a median of $906,000, against $800,000 in Tonsley, though rent is higher in Tonsley. On these figures, Tonsley tends to suit young adults.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Mitchell Park
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more schools inside the suburb (5 vs 0)
- has more parks and reserves (7 vs 3)
- is already more of a family suburb (42% vs 29%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Tonsley
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (24% vs 32%)
- has cheaper houses ($800,000 vs $906,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Mitchell Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($278/wk vs $330/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Mitchell Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (82/100 vs 70/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Mitchell Park
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more residents already 65 and over (18% vs 11%)
- is more walkable (82/100 vs 70/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Tonsley
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- returns a higher gross yield on houses (4.6% vs 4.0%)
Weighs house yield.
Where they sit
Tonsley and Mitchell Park drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Mitchell Park has more residents (5,754 vs 743); Tonsley has higher household incomes ($76,440 vs $60,320).
| Tonsley | Mitchell Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 743 | 5,754 +674% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | — | +5.3% |
| Median age | 31 | 37 |
| Median household income | $76,440/yr +21% vs other | $60,320/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $330/wk +16% vs other | $278/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (29.1%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.2%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.1%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Tonsley | Mitchell Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $800,000 | $906,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $550,000 |
| Median land price | — | $890,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 18 days from 61 sales |
Zoning mix
Tonsley has more commercially zoned land (61% vs 1%).
| Tonsley | Mitchell Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 29% | 88% |
| Commercial | 61% | 1% |
| Industrial | 10% | 5% |
| Parks and recreation | 0% | 6% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Tonsley | Mitchell Park | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 809 across Marion same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -31% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Tonsley | Mitchell Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.6% $680/wk on $772K | 4.0% $680/wk on $895K |
| Units | 5.0% $600/wk on $630K | — |
Ranking within SA
| Tonsley | Mitchell Park | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 16% of SA | Higher than 55% of SA |
| Income | Higher than 52% of SA | Higher than 28% of SA |
| Schools | — | Higher than 47% of SA |
| Walkability | Higher than 88% of SA | Higher than 93% of SA |
| Affordability | Higher than 80% of SA | Higher than 14% of SA |
| EV adoption | Higher than 88% of SA | Higher than 72% of SA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 79% of SA | Higher than 80% of SA |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 90% of SA | Higher than 53% of SA |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 70% of SA | — |
Liveability
Mitchell Park is more walkable (82 vs 70); Tonsley scores higher overall (60 vs 54).
| Tonsley | Mitchell Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 60/100 | 54/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 | below-average income decile 2/10 |
Risk profile
Mitchell Park carries more flood risk (26 vs 10).
| Tonsley | Mitchell Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | High 90/100 | High 81/100 |
| Flood | Low 10/100 | Low 26/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 2 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Tonsley | Mitchell Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 5 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 Tonsley, 1.2 km | 3 Tonsley, 1.1 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 8.9% | 3.4% |
Schools in Tonsley
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Mitchell Park
- Hamilton Secondary College Government · Secondary above peers
- Clovelly Park Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- Sacred Heart College - Champagnat Campus Catholic · Combined
- Sports College South Australia - Mitchell Park Campus Independent · Secondary
- Suneden Specialist School Independent · Combined · Special school
Amenities in the suburb
| Tonsley | Mitchell Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 3 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 7 |
| Childcare | 1 same for both | |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 1 |
| EV chargers | 1 | 0 |
Mobility
| Tonsley | Mitchell Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 70/100 | 82/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 11.1 km | 11.3 km +2% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 19 min same for both | |
| Public transport score | 90/100 Rail · Bus same for both | |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 33.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 71.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.5% postcode 5042 | 0.8% postcode 5043 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 54 postcode 5042 | 46 postcode 5043 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (68.8%).
Setting
| Tonsley | Mitchell Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 52 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 35 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 5.2 km | 4.6 km |
NBN connectivity
| Tonsley | Mitchell Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 65/100 | 66/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 36% 338 premises | 36% 3,043 premises |
Climate
| Tonsley | Mitchell Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 394 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.1°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 7.8°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Tonsley | Mitchell Park | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 1.12 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Tonsley | Mitchell Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,782/yr same for both | |
| Council | Marion same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Tonsley | Mitchell Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Boothby same for both | |
| Member | Louise Miller-Frost same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Tonsley | Mitchell Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Mitchell Park
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Tonsley
Other comparisons with Mitchell Park
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.