Teesdale vs Bannockburn
In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Teesdale: a median of $939,000, against $760,000 in Bannockburn. On these figures, Bannockburn tends to suit buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Bannockburn
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (9 vs 3)
- has more childcare (6 vs 3)
- But Teesdale carries lower crime risk (15/100 vs 33/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Bannockburn
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper houses ($760,000 vs $938,750)
- has cheaper land ($382,500 vs $450,000)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Bannockburn
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- sits closer to the CBD (88.6 km vs 98.4 km)
- has a shorter drive in (73 min vs 80 min)
- But Teesdale is more walkable (50/100 vs 39/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Teesdale
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (15/100 vs 33/100)
- is more walkable (50/100 vs 39/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Teesdale
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (34.1% vs 22.5%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Teesdale and Bannockburn drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Bannockburn has more residents (6,470 vs 2,308); Teesdale skews older (37 vs 35).
| Teesdale | Bannockburn | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,308 | 6,470 +180% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +34.1% | +22.5% |
| Median age | 37 | 35 |
| Median household income | $112,892/yr +5% vs other | $106,860/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $400/wk +2% vs other | $390/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.2%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.5%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.0%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Teesdale | Bannockburn | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $938,750 | $760,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $420,000 |
| Median land price | $450,000 | $382,500 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 55 days from 39 sales | 32 days from 92 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
20 vs 54 sales
47 vs 101 sales
Zoning mix
| Teesdale | Bannockburn | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 78% | 74% |
| Residential | 20% | 13% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 1% | 6% |
| Parks and recreation | 1% | 6% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Teesdale | Bannockburn | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 186 across Golden Plains same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +10% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Teesdale | Bannockburn | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 4.1% $638/wk on $815K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| Teesdale | Bannockburn | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — | Higher than 46% of VIC |
| Income | Higher than 86% of VIC | Higher than 79% of VIC |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 86% of VIC | Higher than 84% of VIC |
| Affordability | — | Higher than 83% of VIC |
| EV adoption | Higher than 42% of VIC | Higher than 64% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 43% of VIC | Higher than 90% of VIC |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 72% of VIC |
Liveability
Teesdale is more walkable (50 vs 39); Teesdale scores higher overall (66 vs 59).
| Teesdale | Bannockburn | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 66/100 | 59/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 |
Risk profile
Bannockburn carries more bushfire risk (14 vs 0); Bannockburn carries more crime risk (33 vs 15).
| Teesdale | Bannockburn | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Low 14/100 |
| Crime | Low 15/100 | Low 33/100 |
| Flood | Moderate 48/100 | Moderate 41/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Teesdale | Bannockburn | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 2 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 2 |
Schools in Teesdale
- Teesdale Primary School Government · Primary at peers
Schools in Bannockburn
- Bannockburn P-12 College Government · Combined below peers
- St Mary MacKillop Catholic Primary School Catholic · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Teesdale | Bannockburn | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 2 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 | 7 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 9 |
| Childcare | 3 | 6 |
| GPs | 1 | 2 |
| Pharmacies | 1 same for both | |
| Police stations | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 2 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 3 |
| EV chargers | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 2 | 13 |
Mobility
Teesdale sits further from the CBD (98.4 km vs 88.6 km).
| Teesdale | Bannockburn | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 50/100 | 39/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 98.4 km +10% vs other | 88.6 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 80 min | 73 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.5% postcode 3328 | 0.7% postcode 3331 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 67 postcode 3328 | 59 postcode 3331 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (77.7%).
Setting
| Teesdale | Bannockburn | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 109 m above sea level, at the suburb centre same for both | |
| Distance to the ocean | 28.5 km | 19.5 km |
NBN connectivity
| Teesdale | Bannockburn | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 29/100 | 79/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 783 premises | 63% 2,712 premises |
Climate
| Teesdale | Bannockburn | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 502 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 25.8°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 5.3°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Teesdale | Bannockburn | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,052/yr same for both | |
| Council | Golden Plains same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Teesdale | Bannockburn | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Ballarat | Corio |
| Member | Catherine King | Richard Marles |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Teesdale | Bannockburn | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Teesdale
Other comparisons with Bannockburn
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.