Tea Tree Gully vs Redwood Park
Redwood Park is the younger of the two, with a median age of 40 against 44 in Tea Tree Gully. In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Tea Tree Gully: a median of $955,000, against $840,000 in Redwood Park, though rent is higher in Redwood Park.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Redwood Park
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
- has more parks and reserves (8 vs 4)
- is already more of a family suburb (70% vs 62%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Redwood Park
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper land ($427,500 vs $553,500)
- has cheaper houses ($840,000 vs $955,000)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Redwood Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (78/100 vs 50/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 5 things we measure here
- Tea Tree Gully has more GPs (2 vs 0)
- Redwood Park is more walkable (78/100 vs 50/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
They split
one each way, out of the 2 things we measure here
- Tea Tree Gully is growing faster (7.9% vs -1.0%)
- Redwood Park returns a higher gross yield on houses (4.0% vs 3.5%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Tea Tree Gully and Redwood Park drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Redwood Park has more residents (5,367 vs 3,499); Redwood Park has higher household incomes ($95,264 vs $83,564).
| Tea Tree Gully | Redwood Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,499 | 5,367 +53% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +7.9% | -1.0% |
| Median age | 44 | 40 |
| Median household income | $83,564/yr | $95,264/yr +14% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $325/wk | $350/wk +8% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (13.5%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.8%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (9.7%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Tea Tree Gully | Redwood Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $955,000 | $840,000 |
| Median unit price | $592,500 | — |
| Median land price | $553,500 | $427,500 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 20 days from 36 sales | 18 days from 54 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
34 vs 86 sales
21 vs 27 sales
6 vs 6 sales
Zoning mix
Tea Tree Gully has more land zoned for conservation (63% vs 0%).
| Tea Tree Gully | Redwood Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 37% | 99% |
| Environmental | 63% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Tea Tree Gully | Redwood Park | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 574 across Tea Tree Gully same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +36% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Tea Tree Gully | Redwood Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.5% $660/wk on $970K | 4.0% $650/wk on $849K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within SA
| Tea Tree Gully | Redwood Park | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 30% of SA | Higher than 22% of SA |
| Income | — | Higher than 74% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 80% of SA | Higher than 91% of SA |
| Affordability | — | Higher than 91% of SA |
| EV adoption | Higher than 73% of SA | Higher than 53% of SA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 86% of SA | Higher than 94% of SA |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 31% of SA | Higher than 55% of SA |
Liveability
Redwood Park scores higher overall (64 vs 35); Redwood Park is more walkable (78 vs 50).
| Tea Tree Gully | Redwood Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | B |
| Score | 35/100 | 64/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 |
Risk profile
Tea Tree Gully carries more bushfire risk (87 vs 0).
| Tea Tree Gully | Redwood Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 87/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | Low 35/100 | Low 33/100 |
| Flood | High 70/100 | High 72/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 6 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Tea Tree Gully | Redwood Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 2 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 2 | 0 |
| Universities within 10 km | None | 1 Adelaide University, Mawson Lakes Campus, 8.7 km |
Schools in Tea Tree Gully
- Saint David's Parish School Catholic · Primary below peers
- Tea Tree Gully Primary School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Redwood Park
- Redwood Park Primary School Government · Primary above peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Tea Tree Gully | Redwood Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 5 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 8 |
| Childcare | 4 | 5 |
| GPs | 2 | 0 |
| Police stations | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 0 | 7 |
Mobility
| Tea Tree Gully | Redwood Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 50/100 | 78/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 19.5 km +8% vs other | 18 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 31 min | 28 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus same for both | |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 72.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 63.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.8% postcode 5091 | 0.5% postcode 5097 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 66 postcode 5091 | 63 postcode 5097 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (77.2%).
Setting
| Tea Tree Gully | Redwood Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 271 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 165 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 16.3 km | 13.7 km |
NBN connectivity
| Tea Tree Gully | Redwood Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 75/100 | 84/100 |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 3% 1,574 premises | 35% 2,217 premises |
Climate
| Tea Tree Gully | Redwood Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 404 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.4°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.5°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Tea Tree Gully | Redwood Park | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | — same for both | |
| PM10 | — same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.51 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Tea Tree Gully | Redwood Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,000/yr same for both | |
| Council | Tea Tree Gully same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Tea Tree Gully | Redwood Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Makin same for both | |
| Member | Tony Zappia same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Tea Tree Gully | Redwood Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Tea Tree Gully
Redwood Park
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Tea Tree Gully
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.