Taylor vs Jacka
In both, most households own their home and most households are couple families. In Taylor, the large majority of homes are detached houses. Houses cost more in Jacka: a median of $1.25 million, against $1.08 million in Taylor, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Taylor tends to suit couples.
Taylor is a substantially larger suburb with 2220 residents compared to Jacka's 712, and offers notably stronger liveability and walkability scores of 49 and 48 respectively, against Jacka's 19 for both. Taylor also commands higher median household income at $138,060 versus $112,320, and has significantly lower bushfire risk at 0 compared to Jacka's 92. However, Jacka offers more affordable rental options at $282 per week versus Taylor's $450, though house and unit purchase prices are higher in Jacka. Taylor suits buyers prioritising walkability, community amenities, and lower environmental risk, while Jacka may appeal to renters seeking lower weekly costs despite its smaller population and more remote feel.
Written by an AI language model from the figures below. Every number in it is checked against those figures before it is published.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Taylor
ahead on 4 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more childcare (4 vs 0)
- has more schools inside the suburb (2 vs 0)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (83% vs 45%)
- But Jacka carries lower crime risk (50/100 vs 84/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Taylor
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- has cheaper units ($515,000 vs $611,000)
- has cheaper houses ($1,085,000 vs $1,250,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Taylor
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (11% vs 21%)
- has cheaper rent ($282/wk vs $450/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Taylor
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (48/100 vs 19/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Jacka
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (55% vs 17%)
- carries lower crime risk (50/100 vs 84/100)
- But Taylor is more walkable (48/100 vs 19/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Taylor
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- returns a higher gross yield on houses (4.7% vs 3.9%)
Weighs house yield.
Where they sit
Taylor and Jacka drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Taylor has more residents (2,220 vs 712); Jacka rents higher ($450/wk vs $282/wk).
| Taylor | Jacka | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,220 +68% vs other | 712 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | — | +6.3% |
| Median age | 30 same for both | |
| Median household income | $138,060/yr +19% vs other | $112,320/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $282/wk | $450/wk +60% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.7%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.3%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.0%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Taylor | Jacka | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,085,000 | $1,250,000 |
| Median unit price | $515,000 | $611,000 |
| Median land price | $722,250 | $650,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 36 days from 74 sales | 47 days from 20 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
28 vs 6 sales
50 vs 24 sales
Development activity
| Taylor | Jacka | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 3,750 across Unincorporated ACT same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -48% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Taylor | Jacka | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.7% $700/wk on $779K | 3.9% $970/wk on $1.3M |
| Units | 6.1% $620/wk on $529K | — |
Ranking within ACT
| Taylor | Jacka | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 73% of ACT | Higher than 21% of ACT |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 31% of ACT | Higher than 13% of ACT |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 38% of ACT | Higher than 56% of ACT |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 90% of ACT | Higher than 89% of ACT |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 76% of ACT | Higher than 26% of ACT |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 54% of ACT | — |
Liveability
Taylor scores higher overall (49 vs 19); Taylor is more walkable (48 vs 19).
| Taylor | Jacka | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | D |
| Score | 49/100 | 19/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 | advantaged area decile 8/10 |
Risk profile
Jacka carries more bushfire risk (92 vs 0); Taylor carries more crime risk (84 vs 50).
| Taylor | Jacka | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | High 92/100 |
| Crime | High 84/100 | Moderate 50/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Taylor | Jacka | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 2 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 2 | 0 |
Schools in Taylor
- Aunty Agnes Shea High School Government · Secondary below peers
- Margaret Hendry School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Jacka
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Taylor | Jacka | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 0 |
| Childcare | 4 | 0 |
| Waterways | 5 | 1 |
Mobility
| Taylor | Jacka | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 48/100 | 19/100 |
| Distance to Canberra | 18.6 km | 19.1 km +3% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 27 min | 28 min |
| Public transport score | 74/100 Bus | 31/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 26.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 3.5 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 10 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 2.7% postcode 2913 | 3.7% postcode 2914 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 47 postcode 2913 | 47 postcode 2914 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (78.4%).
Setting
| Taylor | Jacka | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 672 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 645 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Taylor | Jacka | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 100/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 100% 2,658 premises | 100% 255 premises |
Climate
| Taylor | Jacka | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 622 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 0.8°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Taylor | Jacka | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.6 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 11.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.41 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Taylor | Jacka | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $3,105/yr same for both | |
| Council | Unincorporated ACT same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Taylor | Jacka | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Fenner same for both | |
| Member | Andrew Leigh same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Taylor | Jacka | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | Not offered same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | None same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Taylor
Other comparisons with Jacka
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.