Tarwin Lower vs Fish Creek
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Tarwin Lower, about half of households are people living alone. Houses cost more in Fish Creek: a median of $653,000, against $422,000 in Tarwin Lower, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Tarwin Lower tends to suit people living alone and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Tarwin Lower
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more parks and reserves (10 vs 2)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Tarwin Lower
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($421,500 vs $652,750)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Tarwin Lower
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($210/wk vs $235/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Fish Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- sits closer to the CBD (173.6 km vs 175.9 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Too close to call
Nothing among the 4 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Tarwin Lower
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (29.1% vs 3.7%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Tarwin Lower and Fish Creek drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Fish Creek has more residents (858 vs 462); Fish Creek rents higher ($235/wk vs $210/wk).
| Tarwin Lower | Fish Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 462 | 858 +86% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +29.1% | +3.7% |
| Median age | 53 | 51 |
| Median household income | $65,624/yr | $66,612/yr +2% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $210/wk | $235/wk +12% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.3%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.5%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Tarwin Lower | Fish Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $421,500 | $652,750 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $1,075,000 same for both | |
Zoning mix
Fish Creek has more rural and farming land (96% vs 82%).
| Tarwin Lower | Fish Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 82% | 96% |
| Parks and recreation | 10% | 3% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 1% same for both | |
| Planning zones cover 92% of Tarwin Lower and 100% of Fish Creek. The rest is unzoned land such as water or road reserve. | ||
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Tarwin Lower | Fish Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 170 across South Gippsland same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +21% same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| Tarwin Lower | Fish Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | — | Higher than 27% of VIC |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 49% of VIC | Higher than 17% of VIC |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 63% of VIC | Higher than 73% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 18% of VIC | Higher than 40% of VIC |
Liveability
| Tarwin Lower | Fish Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | B |
| Score | — | 52/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Tarwin Lower carries more bushfire risk (12 vs 0); Tarwin Lower carries more flood risk (73 vs 23).
| Tarwin Lower | Fish Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 12/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 62/100 | Moderate 55/100 |
| Flood | High 73/100 | Low 23/100 |
| Coastal erosion | High 92/100 | None 0/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Tarwin Lower | Fish Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 1 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Tarwin Lower
- Tarwin Lower Primary School Government · Primary at peers
Schools in Fish Creek
- Fish Creek and District Primary School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Tarwin Lower | Fish Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 10 | 2 |
| Childcare | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 same for both | |
| Fuel stations | 1 same for both | |
| Beaches | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 4 same for both | |
Mobility
Tarwin Lower sits further from the CBD (175.9 km vs 173.6 km).
| Tarwin Lower | Fish Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Melbourne | 175.9 km +1% vs other | 173.6 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 138 min | 137 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.6% postcode 3956 | 0.9% postcode 3959 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 36 postcode 3956 | 42 postcode 3959 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (61.3%).
Setting
| Tarwin Lower | Fish Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 37 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 77 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 3.6 km | 9.3 km |
NBN connectivity
| Tarwin Lower | Fish Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 20/100 | 29/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 121 premises | 0% 492 premises |
Climate
| Tarwin Lower | Fish Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 906 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 24.6°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.9°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Tarwin Lower | Fish Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,282/yr same for both | |
| Council | South Gippsland same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Tarwin Lower | Fish Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Monash same for both | |
| Member | Mary Aldred same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Tarwin Lower | Fish Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Tarwin Lower
Other comparisons with Fish Creek
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.