Takura vs Beelbi Creek
Takura is the younger of the two, with a median age of 43 against 46 in Beelbi Creek. In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. On these figures, Beelbi Creek tends to suit share households and couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Takura
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (42/100 vs 58/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Beelbi Creek
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper rent ($175/wk vs $353/wk)
- leaves renters under less rental stress (13% vs 19%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Beelbi Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- sits closer to the CBD (280.3 km vs 284.8 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Takura
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (42/100 vs 58/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Takura and Beelbi Creek drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Takura has more residents (553 vs 143); Takura rents higher ($353/wk vs $175/wk).
| Takura | Beelbi Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 553 +74% vs other | 143 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +4.7% | +0.7% |
| Median age | 43 | 46 |
| Median household income | $96,928/yr +26% vs other | $71,500/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $353/wk +50% vs other | $175/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.9%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (6.5%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.5%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Takura | Beelbi Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,100,000 | — |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $949,000 | — |
Development activity
| Takura | Beelbi Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,578 across Fraser Coast same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -8% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Takura | Beelbi Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 70% of QLD | Higher than 39% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 50% of QLD | Higher than 5% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 60% of QLD | Higher than 32% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 62% of QLD | Higher than 33% of QLD |
Liveability
| Takura | Beelbi Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | D | — |
| Score | 30/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 | high-need area decile 1/10 |
Risk profile
Beelbi Creek carries more crime risk (58 vs 42).
| Takura | Beelbi Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 52/100 | Moderate 56/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 42/100 | Moderate 58/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km | 0 within 5 km |
Schools
| Takura | Beelbi Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Takura | Beelbi Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 2 |
| Waterways | 1 | 3 |
Mobility
Takura sits further from the CBD (284.8 km vs 280.3 km).
| Takura | Beelbi Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Brisbane | 284.8 km +2% vs other | 280.3 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 198 min | 194 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.4% postcode 4655 | 0.2% postcode 4659 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 81 postcode 4655 | 94 postcode 4659 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (82.2%).
Setting
| Takura | Beelbi Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 8 m above sea level, at the suburb centre same for both | |
| Distance to the ocean | 5.1 km | 5.7 km |
NBN connectivity
| Takura | Beelbi Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 | 26/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 219 premises | 0% 41 premises |
Climate
| Takura | Beelbi Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,074 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 31.0°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 9.7°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Takura | Beelbi Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.5 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 14.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Takura | Beelbi Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,576/yr same for both | |
| Council | Fraser Coast same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Takura | Beelbi Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Hinkler same for both | |
| Member | David Batt same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Takura | Beelbi Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Takura
Other comparisons with Beelbi Creek
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.