Table Top vs Gerogery
In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Table Top: a median of $1.23 million, against $850,000 in Gerogery, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Table Top tends to suit couples, while Gerogery suits buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Table Top
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (5 vs 1)
- is already more of a family suburb (84% vs 71%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Table Top has cheaper land ($650,000 vs $950,000)
- Gerogery has cheaper houses ($850,000 vs $1,225,000)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Gerogery
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($250/wk vs $380/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Table Top sits closer to the CBD (531.5 km vs 540.7 km)
- Gerogery is more walkable (17/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Gerogery
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (17/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Gerogery
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (21.1% vs 6.4%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Table Top and Gerogery drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Table Top has more residents (1,516 vs 684); Table Top rents higher ($380/wk vs $250/wk).
| Table Top | Gerogery | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,516 +55% vs other | 684 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +6.4% | +21.1% |
| Median age | 42 | 41 |
| Median household income | $128,700/yr +27% vs other | $94,588/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $380/wk +34% vs other | $250/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.7%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.6%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (2.3%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Table Top | Gerogery | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,225,000 | $850,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $650,000 | $950,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 45 days from 9 sales | — |
Zoning mix
Gerogery has more rural and farming land (95% vs 65%); Table Top has more land zoned for conservation (21% vs 1%).
| Table Top | Gerogery | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 65% | 95% |
| Environmental | 21% | 1% |
| Residential | 9% | 4% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 2% | 1% |
| Commercial | 2% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Table Top | Gerogery | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 423 across Albury | 86 across Greater Hume |
| Approvals change year on year | +14% | +33% |
Ranking within NSW
| Table Top | Gerogery | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 62% of NSW | Higher than 44% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 88% of NSW | Higher than 62% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 42% of NSW | Higher than 68% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 70% of NSW | Higher than 67% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 63% of NSW | Higher than 32% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 62% of NSW | Higher than 61% of NSW |
Liveability
Gerogery is more walkable (17 vs 0); Table Top scores higher overall (53 vs 40).
| Table Top | Gerogery | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | C |
| Score | 53/100 | 40/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 |
Risk profile
Gerogery carries more bushfire risk (48 vs 26).
| Table Top | Gerogery | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 26/100 | Moderate 48/100 |
| Crime | Low 32/100 | Low 26/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Table Top | Gerogery | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 0 |
Schools in Table Top
- Table Top Public School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Gerogery
- Gerogery Public School Government · Primary
Amenities in the suburb
| Table Top | Gerogery | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 1 |
| Waterways | 6 | 16 |
Mobility
Gerogery sits further from the CBD (540.7 km vs 531.5 km).
| Table Top | Gerogery | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 17/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 531.5 km | 540.7 km +2% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 325 min | 329 min |
| Public transport score | 46/100 Bus | 31/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 27.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 12.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual | 1 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.6% postcode 2640 | 0.3% postcode 2642 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 54 postcode 2640 | 80 postcode 2642 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (78.1%).
Setting
| Table Top | Gerogery | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 189 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 247 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Table Top | Gerogery | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 1% 581 premises | 0% 252 premises |
Climate
| Table Top | Gerogery | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 645 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 33.3°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 2.5°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Table Top | Gerogery | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 7.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 18.1 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.64 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Table Top | Gerogery | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,574/yr | $992/yr |
| Council | Albury | Greater Hume |
Federal electorate
| Table Top | Gerogery | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Farrer same for both | |
| Member | David Farley same for both | |
| Party | One Nation same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Table Top | Gerogery | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Table Top
Other comparisons with Gerogery
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.