Stockyard Creek vs Whiteman Creek
Whiteman Creek is the younger of the two, with a median age of 51 against 54 in Stockyard Creek. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Whiteman Creek, about half of households are couple families. On these figures, Stockyard Creek tends to suit people living alone, while Whiteman Creek suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Whiteman Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is already more of a family suburb (63% vs 36%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Whiteman Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (19% vs 33%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Whiteman Creek
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (15% vs 39%)
- has cheaper rent ($243/wk vs $350/wk)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
Whiteman Creek
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- sits closer to the CBD (633.2 km vs 643.4 km)
- has a shorter drive in (425 min vs 430 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Too close to call
Nothing among the 4 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Stockyard Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (34.1% vs -4.8%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Stockyard Creek and Whiteman Creek drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Whiteman Creek has more residents (158 vs 55); Whiteman Creek has higher household incomes ($84,500 vs $46,800).
| Stockyard Creek | Whiteman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 55 | 158 +187% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +34.1% | -4.8% |
| Median age | 54 | 51 |
| Median household income | $46,800/yr | $84,500/yr +81% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $350/wk +31% vs other | $243/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (32.7%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (12.7%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.8%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Stockyard Creek | Whiteman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $820,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Zoning mix
| Stockyard Creek | Whiteman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 99% | 96% |
| Environmental | 1% | 4% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Stockyard Creek | Whiteman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 246 across Clarence Valley same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -80% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Stockyard Creek | Whiteman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — | Higher than 35% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 8% of NSW | — |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 2% of NSW | Higher than 48% of NSW |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 17% of NSW | Higher than 18% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 25% of NSW | Higher than 38% of NSW |
Liveability
| Stockyard Creek | Whiteman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 2/10 | below-average income decile 3/10 |
Risk profile
| Stockyard Creek | Whiteman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 74/100 | Moderate 69/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 64/100 | Moderate 66/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Stockyard Creek | Whiteman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Stockyard Creek | Whiteman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Waterways | 14 | 1 |
Mobility
Stockyard Creek sits further from the CBD (643.4 km vs 633.2 km).
| Stockyard Creek | Whiteman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 5/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 643.4 km +2% vs other | 633.2 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 430 min | 425 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.2% postcode 2460 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 60 postcode 2460 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (100.0%).
Setting
| Stockyard Creek | Whiteman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 92 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 72 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 46.8 km | 44.3 km |
NBN connectivity
| Stockyard Creek | Whiteman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 17/100 | 26/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 27 premises | 0% 53 premises |
Climate
| Stockyard Creek | Whiteman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,060 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.0°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 8.3°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Stockyard Creek | Whiteman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,380/yr same for both | |
| Council | Clarence Valley same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Stockyard Creek | Whiteman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Page same for both | |
| Member | Kevin Hogan same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Stockyard Creek | Whiteman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Stockyard Creek
Other comparisons with Whiteman Creek
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.