Springfield Central vs Springfield Lakes
In Springfield Central, most households rent, the large majority of homes are flats or apartments, and the large majority of households are people living alone. In Springfield Lakes, most households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. Units cost more in Springfield Lakes: a median of $692,000, against $622,000 in Springfield Central, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Springfield Central tends to suit renters, young adults, and people living alone, while Springfield Lakes suits families with children and couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Springfield Lakes
ahead on 4 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (32 vs 1)
- is already more of a family suburb (78% vs 6%)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (96% vs 9%)
- But Springfield Central has more schools inside the suburb (4 vs 2)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 2 things we measure here
- Springfield Central has cheaper units ($622,500 vs $692,500)
- Springfield Lakes leaves households under less mortgage stress (19% vs 35%)
Weighs unit prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Springfield Central
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (67% vs 44%)
- has cheaper rent ($300/wk vs $410/wk)
- But Springfield Lakes leaves renters under less rental stress (19% vs 28%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Springfield Central
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (82/100 vs 48/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Springfield Central
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (91% vs 4%)
- has more residents already 65 and over (22% vs 6%)
- is more walkable (82/100 vs 48/100)
- But Springfield Lakes carries lower crime risk (30/100 vs 99/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Springfield Central
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (105.3% vs 12.4%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Springfield Central and Springfield Lakes drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Springfield Lakes has more residents (17,211 vs 234); Springfield Lakes has higher household incomes ($113,568 vs $56,628).
| Springfield Central | Springfield Lakes | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 234 | 17,211 +7255% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +105.3% | +12.4% |
| Median age | 30 | 31 |
| Median household income | $56,628/yr | $113,568/yr +101% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $300/wk | $410/wk +37% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.1%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.7%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (7.3%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Springfield Central | Springfield Lakes | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $903,000 |
| Median unit price | $622,500 | $692,500 |
| Median land price | — | $867,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 21 days from 277 sales |
Development activity
| Springfield Central | Springfield Lakes | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 3,476 across Ipswich same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -7% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Springfield Central | Springfield Lakes | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 3.7% $700/wk on $980K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Springfield Central | Springfield Lakes | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 19% of QLD | Higher than 84% of QLD |
| Schools | Higher than 1% of QLD | — |
| Walkability | Higher than 96% of QLD | Higher than 86% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 93% of QLD same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 90% of QLD | Higher than 88% of QLD |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 36% of QLD |
Liveability
Springfield Central is more walkable (82 vs 48).
| Springfield Central | Springfield Lakes | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | B |
| Score | — | 55/100 |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 3/10 | advantaged area decile 8/10 |
Risk profile
Springfield Central carries more crime risk (99 vs 30); Springfield Lakes carries more bushfire risk (57 vs 36).
| Springfield Central | Springfield Lakes | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 36/100 | Moderate 57/100 |
| Crime | High 99/100 | Low 30/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Springfield Central | Springfield Lakes | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 4 | 2 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 3 | 2 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Springfield Central
- Springfield Central State High School Government · Secondary at peers
- Springfield Central State School Government · Primary at peers
- St Peters Lutheran College Springfield Independent · Combined at peers
- Mastery Schools Australia - Springfield Central Campus Independent · Combined
Schools in Springfield Lakes
- Good Shepherd Catholic Primary School Catholic · Primary at peers
- Springfield Lakes State School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Springfield Central | Springfield Lakes | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 3 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 16 | 8 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 32 |
| Childcare | 8 | 5 |
| GPs | 4 | 3 |
| Pharmacies | 2 | 1 |
| Hospitals | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 8 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 2 | 0 |
| EV chargers | 2 | 0 |
| Waterways | 1 | 8 |
Mobility
| Springfield Central | Springfield Lakes | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 82/100 | 48/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 32.9 km | 33.8 km +3% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 36 min same for both | |
| Public transport score | 77/100 Bus | 76/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 56.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 68.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.9% postcode 4300 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 74 postcode 4300 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (69.9%).
Setting
| Springfield Central | Springfield Lakes | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 52 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 65 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 35.1 km | 34.6 km |
NBN connectivity
| Springfield Central | Springfield Lakes | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 79/100 | 77/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the building | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 44% 456 premises | 58% 4,329 premises |
Climate
| Springfield Central | Springfield Lakes | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,032 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 8.9°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Springfield Central | Springfield Lakes | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 20.4 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.64 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Springfield Central | Springfield Lakes | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,713/yr same for both | |
| Council | Ipswich same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Springfield Central | Springfield Lakes | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Blair | Oxley |
| Member | Shayne Neumann | Milton Dick |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Springfield Central | Springfield Lakes | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Springfield Central
Springfield Lakes
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Springfield Central
Other comparisons with Springfield Lakes
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.