Southern Cross vs Towers Hill
Southern Cross is the younger of the two, with a median age of 43 against 51 in Towers Hill. In both, most households own their home and most homes are detached houses. In Southern Cross, most households are couple families. In Towers Hill, most households are people living alone. On these figures, Southern Cross tends to suit families with children and couples, while Towers Hill suits people living alone and older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Southern Cross
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- is already more of a family suburb (70% vs 41%)
- carries lower crime risk (38/100 vs 64/100)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (97% vs 69%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Southern Cross
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (21% vs 26%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Towers Hill
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (35% vs 12%)
- has cheaper rent ($190/wk vs $300/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Towers Hill
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (17/100 vs 0/100)
- has a shorter drive in (920 min vs 935 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (1356.5 km vs 1367.1 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Towers Hill
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (17/100 vs 0/100)
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (32% vs 3%)
- has more residents already 65 and over (30% vs 20%)
- But Southern Cross carries lower crime risk (38/100 vs 64/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Southern Cross
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (6.1% vs -12.8%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Southern Cross and Towers Hill drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Southern Cross has more residents (575 vs 190); Southern Cross has higher household incomes ($92,300 vs $49,348).
| Southern Cross | Towers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 575 +67% vs other | 190 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +6.1% | -12.8% |
| Median age | 43 | 51 |
| Median household income | $92,300/yr +47% vs other | $49,348/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $300/wk +37% vs other | $190/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.1%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (2.1%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.2%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Development activity
| Southern Cross | Towers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 24 across Charters Towers same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -67% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Southern Cross | Towers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 65% of QLD | Higher than 12% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 45% of QLD | Higher than 77% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 23% of QLD same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 45% of QLD | Higher than 68% of QLD |
Liveability
Towers Hill is more walkable (17 vs 0).
| Southern Cross | Towers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | — |
| Score | 43/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 3/10 | below-average income decile 2/10 |
Risk profile
Towers Hill carries more crime risk (64 vs 38).
| Southern Cross | Towers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Low 38/100 | Moderate 64/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Southern Cross | Towers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Southern Cross | Towers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Waterways | 7 | 0 |
Mobility
Southern Cross sits further from the CBD (1367.1 km vs 1356.5 km).
| Southern Cross | Towers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 17/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 1367.1 km | 1356.5 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 935 min | 920 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.2% postcode 4820 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 49 postcode 4820 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (73.3%).
Setting
| Southern Cross | Towers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 299 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 403 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Southern Cross | Towers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 29/100 | 41/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Fibre to the node |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 210 premises | 0% 122 premises |
Climate
| Southern Cross | Towers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 690 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 33.9°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 12.0°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Southern Cross | Towers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,328/yr same for both | |
| Council | Charters Towers same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Southern Cross | Towers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Kennedy same for both | |
| Member | Bob Katter same for both | |
| Party | Katter's Australian Party (KAP) same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Southern Cross | Towers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Southern Cross
Towers Hill
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Southern Cross
Other comparisons with Towers Hill
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.