South Riana vs Upper Natone
South Riana is the younger of the two, with a median age of 38 against 49 in Upper Natone. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In South Riana, most households are couple families. On these figures, South Riana tends to suit families with children and couples, while Upper Natone suits people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
South Riana
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is already more of a family suburb (74% vs 48%)
Weighs schools, house stock, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Upper Natone
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($235/wk vs $300/wk)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
South Riana
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (230 min vs 238 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (328.7 km vs 336 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, and walkability.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
South Riana and Upper Natone drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
South Riana has more residents (212 vs 111); Upper Natone skews older (49 vs 38).
| South Riana | Upper Natone | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 212 +48% vs other | 111 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -0.9% same for both | |
| Median age | 38 | 49 |
| Median household income | $79,872/yr +1% vs other | $78,936/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $300/wk +22% vs other | $235/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.5%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.5%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.4%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| South Riana | Upper Natone | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $512,500 | — |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Zoning mix
Upper Natone has more rural and farming land (89% vs 76%); South Riana has more land zoned for conservation (24% vs 11%).
| South Riana | Upper Natone | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 76% | 89% |
| Environmental | 24% | 11% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| South Riana | Upper Natone | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 84 across Central Coast (Tas.) | 90 across Burnie |
| Approvals change year on year | -38% | +1200% |
Ranking within TAS
| South Riana | Upper Natone | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 71% of TAS | Higher than 70% of TAS |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 2% of TAS | Higher than 19% of TAS |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 68% of TAS | Higher than 43% of TAS |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 28% of TAS | Higher than 22% of TAS |
Liveability
| South Riana | Upper Natone | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 3/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 |
Risk profile
Upper Natone carries more bushfire risk (19 vs 0).
| South Riana | Upper Natone | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Low 19/100 |
| Crime | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| South Riana | Upper Natone | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| South Riana | Upper Natone | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 3 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 0 | 17 |
Mobility
Upper Natone sits further from the CBD (336 km vs 328.7 km).
| South Riana | Upper Natone | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Hobart | 328.7 km | 336 km +2% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 230 min | 238 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.7% postcode 7316 | 0.4% postcode 7321 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 31 postcode 7316 | 26 postcode 7321 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (74.7%).
Setting
| South Riana | Upper Natone | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 398 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 383 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 17.6 km | 19.3 km |
NBN connectivity
| South Riana | Upper Natone | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 24/100 | 18/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Satellite (Sky Muster) |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 63 premises | 0% 55 premises |
Climate
| South Riana | Upper Natone | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 814 mm | 929 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | — | 21.8°C |
| Winter min (Jul) | — | 3.8°C |
Council rates
| South Riana | Upper Natone | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,379/yr | $2,050/yr |
| Council | Central Coast (Tas.) | Burnie |
Federal electorate
| South Riana | Upper Natone | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Braddon same for both | |
| Member | Anne Urquhart same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| South Riana | Upper Natone | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $20,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with South Riana
Other comparisons with Upper Natone
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.