Smiths Lake vs Tarbuck Bay
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Tarbuck Bay, about half of households are people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Smiths Lake has more parks and reserves (6 vs 1)
- Tarbuck Bay carries lower crime risk (44/100 vs 62/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Smiths Lake
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (31% vs 42%)
- has cheaper rent ($380/wk vs $430/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Tarbuck Bay
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (198 min vs 204 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (273 km vs 277.6 km)
- But Smiths Lake is more walkable (25/100 vs 14/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Smiths Lake is more walkable (25/100 vs 14/100)
- Tarbuck Bay carries lower crime risk (44/100 vs 62/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Smiths Lake and Tarbuck Bay drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Smiths Lake has more residents (1,332 vs 194); Smiths Lake has higher household incomes ($62,920 vs $53,092).
| Smiths Lake | Tarbuck Bay | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,332 +85% vs other | 194 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +7.9% | +3.2% |
| Median age | 49 | 48 |
| Median household income | $62,920/yr +16% vs other | $53,092/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $380/wk | $430/wk +13% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.6%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.1%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Smiths Lake | Tarbuck Bay | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $825,000 | $835,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $507,500 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 57 days from 24 sales | — |
Zoning mix
Tarbuck Bay has more rural and farming land (97% vs 23%); Smiths Lake has more land zoned for conservation (72% vs 3%).
| Smiths Lake | Tarbuck Bay | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 23% | 97% |
| Environmental | 72% | 3% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 4% | 0% |
| Residential | 1% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Smiths Lake | Tarbuck Bay | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 743 across Mid-Coast same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +327% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Smiths Lake | Tarbuck Bay | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 2.7% $600/wk on $1.16M | — |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Smiths Lake | Tarbuck Bay | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 36% of NSW | Higher than 44% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 25% of NSW | Higher than 13% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 72% of NSW | Higher than 64% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 43% of NSW | Higher than 26% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 45% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 67% of NSW | Higher than 74% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 10% of NSW | — |
Liveability
Smiths Lake is more walkable (25 vs 14).
| Smiths Lake | Tarbuck Bay | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | D | — |
| Score | 22/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 | below-average income decile 2/10 |
Risk profile
Smiths Lake carries more crime risk (62 vs 44).
| Smiths Lake | Tarbuck Bay | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 91/100 | High 89/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 62/100 | Moderate 44/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Smiths Lake | Tarbuck Bay | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Smiths Lake | Tarbuck Bay | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 1 |
| Childcare | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 2 | 3 |
Mobility
Smiths Lake sits further from the CBD (277.6 km vs 273 km).
| Smiths Lake | Tarbuck Bay | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 25/100 | 14/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 277.6 km +2% vs other | 273 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 204 min | 198 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.4% postcode 2428 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 41 postcode 2428 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (78.5%).
Setting
| Smiths Lake | Tarbuck Bay | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 0 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 26 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 2.1 km 2.9 km to a named beach | 4.0 km |
NBN connectivity
| Smiths Lake | Tarbuck Bay | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 52/100 | 66/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 13% 1,046 premises | 40% 119 premises |
Council rates
| Smiths Lake | Tarbuck Bay | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,560/yr same for both | |
| Council | Mid-Coast same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Smiths Lake | Tarbuck Bay | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Lyne same for both | |
| Member | Alison Penfold same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Smiths Lake | Tarbuck Bay | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Smiths Lake
Other comparisons with Tarbuck Bay
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.