Shoreham vs Red Hill South
Red Hill South is the younger of the two, with a median age of 56 against 61 in Shoreham. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Shoreham, about half of households are people living alone. In Red Hill South, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Shoreham: a median of $2.13 million, against $1.73 million in Red Hill South, though rent is higher in Red Hill South. On these figures, Shoreham tends to suit people living alone and older residents, while Red Hill South suits couples and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Shoreham has more parks and reserves (6 vs 3)
- Red Hill South is already more of a family suburb (60% vs 47%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Red Hill South
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($1,725,000 vs $2,132,500)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Shoreham
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($421/wk vs $500/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Red Hill South
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (10/100 vs 0/100)
- has a shorter drive in (78 min vs 83 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (91.3 km vs 94.7 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Shoreham has more residents already 65 and over (41% vs 31%)
- Red Hill South is more walkable (10/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Red Hill South
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (17.4% vs 11.7%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Shoreham and Red Hill South drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Red Hill South rents higher ($500/wk vs $421/wk); Red Hill South has higher household incomes ($117,572 vs $104,624).
| Shoreham | Red Hill South | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 679 | 708 +4% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +11.7% | +17.4% |
| Median age | 61 | 56 |
| Median household income | $104,624/yr | $117,572/yr +12% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $421/wk | $500/wk +19% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.1%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (25.6%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (7.2%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Shoreham | Red Hill South | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2,132,500 | $1,725,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $1,195,000 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 28 days from 3 sales | — |
Zoning mix
| Shoreham | Red Hill South | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 87% | 96% |
| Residential | 8% | 2% |
| Parks and recreation | 3% | 1% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 2% | 1% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Shoreham | Red Hill South | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 791 across Mornington Peninsula same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +9% same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| Shoreham | Red Hill South | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 77% of VIC | Higher than 90% of VIC |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 16% of VIC | Higher than 69% of VIC |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 99% of VIC | Higher than 100% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 76% of VIC | Higher than 74% of VIC |
Liveability
Red Hill South is more walkable (10 vs 0); Red Hill South scores higher overall (75 vs 70).
| Shoreham | Red Hill South | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A same for both | |
| Score | 70/100 | 75/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Shoreham carries more bushfire risk (22 vs 0); Shoreham carries more flood risk (20 vs 0).
| Shoreham | Red Hill South | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 22/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | Low 28/100 | Low 22/100 |
| Flood | Low 20/100 | None 0/100 |
| Coastal erosion | Low 16/100 | None 0/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Shoreham | Red Hill South | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Shoreham | Red Hill South | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 3 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 same for both | |
| Waterways | 2 same for both | |
Mobility
Shoreham sits further from the CBD (94.7 km vs 91.3 km).
| Shoreham | Red Hill South | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 10/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 94.7 km +4% vs other | 91.3 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 83 min | 78 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 3.1% postcode 3916 | 3.4% postcode 3937 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 47 postcode 3916 | 52 postcode 3937 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (51.9%).
Setting
| Shoreham | Red Hill South | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 61 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 140 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 1.8 km | 4.7 km |
NBN connectivity
| Shoreham | Red Hill South | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 65/100 | 57/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 42% 657 premises | 32% 448 premises |
Climate
| Shoreham | Red Hill South | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 696 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 24.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.5°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Shoreham | Red Hill South | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,659/yr same for both | |
| Council | Mornington Peninsula same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Shoreham | Red Hill South | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Flinders same for both | |
| Member | Zoe Mckenzie same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Shoreham | Red Hill South | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Shoreham
Other comparisons with Red Hill South
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.