Sheidow Park vs Trott Park
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Sheidow Park, most households are couple families. In Trott Park, about half of households are couple families.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Sheidow Park
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more childcare (6 vs 1)
- has more schools inside the suburb (3 vs 0)
- has more parks and reserves (8 vs 5)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Trott Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($350/wk vs $380/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Sheidow Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (70/100 vs 62/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 5 things we measure here
- Sheidow Park is more walkable (70/100 vs 62/100)
- Trott Park has more residents already 65 and over (19% vs 12%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Sheidow Park and Trott Park drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Sheidow Park has more residents (6,731 vs 3,124); Sheidow Park has higher household incomes ($105,248 vs $91,104).
| Sheidow Park | Trott Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,731 +54% vs other | 3,124 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +0.8% | +0.6% |
| Median age | 38 | 39 |
| Median household income | $105,248/yr +13% vs other | $91,104/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $380/wk +8% vs other | $350/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.2%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (8.2%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.1%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Sheidow Park | Trott Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $920,000 | $890,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $570,000 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 17 days from 53 sales | 19 days from 19 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
52 vs 24 sales
43 vs 8 sales
Zoning mix
Trott Park has more land zoned for conservation (31% vs 5%).
| Sheidow Park | Trott Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 79% | 61% |
| Environmental | 5% | 31% |
| Parks and recreation | 13% | 0% |
| Industrial | 2% | 7% |
| Rural and farming | 1% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Sheidow Park | Trott Park | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 809 across Marion same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -31% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Sheidow Park | Trott Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.9% $670/wk on $889K | 3.9% $625/wk on $824K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within SA
| Sheidow Park | Trott Park | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 41% of SA | Higher than 43% of SA |
| Income | Higher than 83% of SA | Higher than 70% of SA |
| Schools | Higher than 82% of SA | — |
| Walkability | Higher than 88% of SA | Higher than 85% of SA |
| Affordability | Higher than 87% of SA | Higher than 71% of SA |
| EV adoption | Higher than 67% of SA same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 89% of SA | Higher than 88% of SA |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 50% of SA | Higher than 53% of SA |
Liveability
Sheidow Park is more walkable (70 vs 62).
| Sheidow Park | Trott Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A | B |
| Score | 67/100 | 63/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 |
Risk profile
| Sheidow Park | Trott Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 38/100 | Moderate 46/100 |
| Crime | Low 29/100 | Low 24/100 |
| Flood | — | Low 11/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 11 within 5 km | 4 within 5 km |
Schools
| Sheidow Park | Trott Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 3 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 2 | 0 |
| Universities within 10 km | 2 Bedford Park, 7.3 km | 2 Bedford Park, 6.0 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 2.1% | 1.7% |
Schools in Sheidow Park
- St Martin de Porres School Catholic · Primary above peers
- Sheidow Park Primary School Government · Primary below peers
- Woodend Primary School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Trott Park
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Sheidow Park | Trott Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 5 |
| Childcare | 6 | 1 |
| GPs | 1 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 2 | 0 |
| Waterways | 2 | 1 |
Mobility
| Sheidow Park | Trott Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 70/100 | 62/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 21.6 km +9% vs other | 19.7 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 28 min | 27 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus | 78/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 151.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 57.5 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual | 1 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.7% postcode 5158 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 74 postcode 5158 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (82.4%).
Setting
| Sheidow Park | Trott Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 126 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 150 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 2.9 km | 3.6 km |
NBN connectivity
| Sheidow Park | Trott Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 75/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Hybrid fibre-coaxial |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 38% 2,520 premises | 23% 1,197 premises |
Climate
| Sheidow Park | Trott Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 394 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.1°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 7.8°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Sheidow Park | Trott Park | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | — same for both | |
| PM10 | 19.5 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.34 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Sheidow Park | Trott Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,782/yr same for both | |
| Council | Marion same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Sheidow Park | Trott Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Kingston same for both | |
| Member | Amanda Rishworth same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Sheidow Park | Trott Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Sheidow Park
Trott Park
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Sheidow Park
Other comparisons with Trott Park
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.