Shanes Park vs Marsden Park
Marsden Park is the younger of the two, with a median age of 32 against 39 in Shanes Park. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Marsden Park, the large majority of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Shanes Park: a median of $2.71 million, against $1.23 million in Marsden Park, though rent is higher in Marsden Park. On these figures, Marsden Park tends to suit families with children, couples, and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Marsden Park
ahead on 4 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more childcare (9 vs 0)
- has more schools inside the suburb (5 vs 0)
- is already more of a family suburb (87% vs 60%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Marsden Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($1,230,000 vs $2,710,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Shanes Park has cheaper rent ($440/wk vs $570/wk)
- Marsden Park leaves renters under less rental stress (21% vs 29%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Marsden Park
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (37/100 vs 14/100)
- has a shorter drive in (47 min vs 54 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (51.1 km vs 54.5 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Marsden Park
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more GPs (3 vs 0)
- is more walkable (37/100 vs 14/100)
- carries lower crime risk (67/100 vs 87/100)
- But Shanes Park has more residents already 65 and over (14% vs 6%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Where they sit
Shanes Park and Marsden Park drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Marsden Park has more residents (14,610 vs 384); Marsden Park has higher household incomes ($141,544 vs $79,612).
| Shanes Park | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 384 | 14,610 +3705% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -5.7% | — |
| Median age | 39 | 32 |
| Median household income | $79,612/yr | $141,544/yr +78% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $440/wk | $570/wk +30% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.2%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.8%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Shanes Park | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2,710,000 | $1,230,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $530,000 |
| Median land price | — | $1,035,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 24 days from 4 sales | 39 days from 246 sales |
Zoning mix
Shanes Park has more land zoned for conservation (64% vs 3%); Shanes Park has more rural and farming land (31% vs 14%).
| Shanes Park | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental | 64% | 3% |
| Rural and farming | 31% | 14% |
| Residential | 0% | 31% |
| Industrial | 0% | 16% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 5% | 16% |
| Commercial | 0% | 10% |
| Parks and recreation | 1% | 7% |
| Other and special use | 0% | 4% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Shanes Park | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 2,325 across Blacktown same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -18% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Shanes Park | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 3.7% $875/wk on $1.24M |
| Units | — | 4.7% $600/wk on $670K |
Ranking within NSW
| Shanes Park | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 92% of NSW | Higher than 59% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 47% of NSW | Higher than 92% of NSW |
| Schools | — | Higher than 19% of NSW |
| Walkability | Higher than 63% of NSW | Higher than 77% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 4% of NSW | Higher than 78% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 75% of NSW | Higher than 96% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 98% of NSW same for both | |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 55% of NSW |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 51% of NSW |
Liveability
Marsden Park is more walkable (37 vs 14).
| Shanes Park | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | C |
| Score | — | 47/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 | very advantaged area decile 10/10 |
Risk profile
Shanes Park carries more bushfire risk (63 vs 38); Shanes Park carries more crime risk (87 vs 67).
| Shanes Park | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 63/100 | Low 38/100 |
| Crime | High 87/100 | Moderate 67/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 5 within 5 km | 3 within 5 km |
Schools
| Shanes Park | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 5 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 3 |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 Western Sydney University - Penrith, 8.6 km | None |
Schools in Shanes Park
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Marsden Park
- St Luke's Catholic College (Secondary) Catholic · Secondary at peers
- Marsden Park Anglican College Independent · Combined below peers
- Marsden Park Public School Government · Primary below peers
- St Luke’s Catholic College (Primary) Catholic · Primary below peers
- St Luke's Arrunga Catholic · Combined · Special school
Amenities in the suburb
| Shanes Park | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 2 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 4 |
| Childcare | 0 | 9 |
| GPs | 0 | 3 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 2 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 4 |
| Waterways | 2 same for both | |
Mobility
Shanes Park sits further from the CBD (54.5 km vs 51.1 km).
| Shanes Park | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 14/100 | 37/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 54.5 km +6% vs other | 51.1 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 54 min | 47 min |
| Public transport score | 23/100 Bus | 79/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 3.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 211.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 10 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.9% postcode 2747 | 2.7% postcode 2765 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 45 postcode 2747 | — postcode 2765 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (47.0%).
Setting
| Shanes Park | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 23 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 46 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 42.7 km | 39.4 km |
NBN connectivity
| Shanes Park | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 98/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 90% 157 premises | 96% 6,110 premises |
Climate
| Shanes Park | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 806 mm | 932 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Shanes Park | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 7.2 µg/m³ | 6.1 µg/m³ |
| PM10 | 16.3 µg/m³ | 15.5 µg/m³ |
| NO₂ | 0.6 pphm | 0.53 pphm |
Council rates
| Shanes Park | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,157/yr same for both | |
| Council | Blacktown same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Shanes Park | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Chifley same for both | |
| Member | Ed Husic same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Shanes Park | Marsden Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Shanes Park
Marsden Park
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Shanes Park
Other comparisons with Marsden Park
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.