Seymour vs Whiteheads Creek
Seymour is the younger of the two, with a median age of 45 against 53 in Whiteheads Creek. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Seymour, about half of households are people living alone. In Whiteheads Creek, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Whiteheads Creek: a median of $1.53 million, against $460,000 in Seymour, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Seymour tends to suit buyers on a tighter budget, while Whiteheads Creek suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Seymour
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (19 vs 0)
- has more schools inside the suburb (5 vs 0)
- has more childcare (5 vs 0)
- But Whiteheads Creek carries lower crime risk (37/100 vs 90/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Seymour
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($460,000 vs $1,530,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Seymour
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (34% vs 6%)
- has cheaper rent ($250/wk vs $295/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Seymour
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (17/100 vs 0/100)
- has a shorter drive in (85 min vs 100 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (111.7 km vs 122.5 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Seymour
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (17/100 vs 0/100)
- has more GPs (3 vs 0)
- But Whiteheads Creek carries lower crime risk (37/100 vs 90/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Seymour and Whiteheads Creek drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Seymour has more residents (6,569 vs 347); Whiteheads Creek has higher household incomes ($90,012 vs $60,580).
| Seymour | Whiteheads Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,569 +95% vs other | 347 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +3.8% | -0.3% |
| Median age | 45 | 53 |
| Median household income | $60,580/yr | $90,012/yr +49% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $250/wk | $295/wk +18% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (2.6%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.7%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Seymour | Whiteheads Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $460,000 | $1,530,000 |
| Median unit price | $370,000 | — |
| Median land price | $256,500 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 67 days from 89 sales | — |
Zoning mix
Whiteheads Creek has more rural and farming land (98% vs 62%).
| Seymour | Whiteheads Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 62% | 98% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 17% | 0% |
| Residential | 9% | 0% |
| Parks and recreation | 8% | 2% |
| Other and special use | 2% | 0% |
| Industrial | 2% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Seymour | Whiteheads Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,074 across Mitchell same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +70% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Seymour | Whiteheads Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.1% $450/wk on $565K | — |
| Units | 4.4% $355/wk on $422K | — |
Ranking within VIC
| Seymour | Whiteheads Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 9% of VIC | — |
| Income | Higher than 21% of VIC | — |
| Schools | Higher than 17% of VIC | — |
| Walkability | Higher than 78% of VIC | Higher than 35% of VIC |
| Affordability | Higher than 82% of VIC | — |
| EV adoption | Higher than 17% of VIC same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 80% of VIC | Higher than 35% of VIC |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 76% of VIC | — |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 26% of VIC | — |
Liveability
Seymour is more walkable (17 vs 0).
| Seymour | Whiteheads Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | D | — |
| Score | 21/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | high-need area decile 1/10 | advantaged area decile 7/10 |
Risk profile
Whiteheads Creek carries more bushfire risk (39 vs 0); Seymour carries more crime risk (90 vs 37).
| Seymour | Whiteheads Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Low 39/100 |
| Crime | High 90/100 | Low 37/100 |
| Flood | Moderate 69/100 | Moderate 46/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 6 within 5 km | 0 within 5 km |
Schools
| Seymour | Whiteheads Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 5 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 0 |
Schools in Seymour
- St Mary's College Catholic · Combined at peers
- Seymour College Government · Combined below peers
- Seymour College-Seymour College Agricultural Block Government · Combined
- Seymour College-Special Campus Government · Combined
- Wodonga Senior Secondary College-Seymour Flexible Learning Centre Government · Secondary
Schools in Whiteheads Creek
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Seymour | Whiteheads Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 4 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 5 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 19 | 0 |
| Childcare | 5 | 0 |
| GPs | 3 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 0 |
| Hospitals | 1 | 0 |
| Police stations | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 5 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 4 | 0 |
| EV chargers | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 6 | 4 |
Mobility
Whiteheads Creek sits further from the CBD (122.5 km vs 111.7 km).
| Seymour | Whiteheads Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 17/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 111.7 km | 122.5 km +10% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 85 min | 100 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.2% postcode 3660 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 46 postcode 3660 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (75.2%).
Setting
| Seymour | Whiteheads Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 143 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 236 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Seymour | Whiteheads Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 71/100 | 28/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 50% 3,850 premises | 0% 172 premises |
Climate
| Seymour | Whiteheads Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 540 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Seymour | Whiteheads Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,947/yr same for both | |
| Council | Mitchell same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Seymour | Whiteheads Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Nicholls same for both | |
| Member | Sam Birrell same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Seymour | Whiteheads Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Seymour
Whiteheads Creek
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Seymour
Other comparisons with Whiteheads Creek
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.