Seaford vs Frankston
Comparing Seaford and Frankston, VIC: Frankston carries more bushfire risk (18 vs 0); Frankston has more residents (37,331 vs 17,215); and Frankston is more walkable (82 vs 62).
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Frankston
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more schools inside the suburb (23 vs 9)
- has more parks and reserves (35 vs 18)
- has more childcare (26 vs 17)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Frankston
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper units ($530,500 vs $610,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Seaford sits closer to the CBD (51.9 km vs 54.7 km)
- Frankston is more walkable (82/100 vs 62/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Frankston
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more GPs (21 vs 5)
- is more walkable (82/100 vs 62/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house yield, unit yield, and population growth.
Where they sit
Seaford and Frankston drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Frankston has more residents (37,331 vs 17,215).
| Seaford | Frankston | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,215 | 37,331 +117% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +4.6% | +3.4% |
| Median age | 40 | 39 |
| Median household income | $78,000/yr +8% vs other | $72,124/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $351/wk +3% vs other | $342/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.3%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.1%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Seaford | Frankston | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $870,000 | $817,500 |
| Median unit price | $610,000 | $530,500 |
| Median land price | $850,000 | $787,500 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 24 days from 188 sales | 22 days from 381 sales |
Unit price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
91 vs 285 sales
55 vs 66 sales
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
31 vs 70 sales
262 vs 534 sales
65 vs 211 sales
18 vs 26 sales
Zoning mix
Seaford has more industrially zoned land (13% vs 0%).
| Seaford | Frankston | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 45% | 63% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 24% | 11% |
| Parks and recreation | 17% | 8% |
| Industrial | 13% | 0% |
| Other and special use | 0% | 10% |
| Commercial | 1% | 7% |
| Rural and farming | 1% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Seaford | Frankston | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 725 across Frankston same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -47% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Seaford | Frankston | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.0% $680/wk on $890K | 4.1% $650/wk on $830K |
| Units | 4.7% $550/wk on $605K | 4.3% $475/wk on $575K |
Ranking within VIC
| Seaford | Frankston | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 65% of VIC | Higher than 57% of VIC |
| Income | Higher than 45% of VIC | Higher than 37% of VIC |
| Schools | Higher than 36% of VIC | Higher than 33% of VIC |
| Walkability | Higher than 88% of VIC | Higher than 94% of VIC |
| Affordability | Higher than 25% of VIC | Higher than 27% of VIC |
| EV adoption | Higher than 66% of VIC | Higher than 78% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 95% of VIC | Higher than 97% of VIC |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 67% of VIC | Higher than 72% of VIC |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 46% of VIC | Higher than 21% of VIC |
Liveability
Frankston is more walkable (82 vs 62).
| Seaford | Frankston | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C same for both | |
| Score | 41/100 same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 |
Risk profile
Frankston carries more bushfire risk (18 vs 0); Seaford carries more flood risk (73 vs 43).
| Seaford | Frankston | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Low 18/100 |
| Crime | High 83/100 | High 92/100 |
| Flood | High 73/100 | Moderate 43/100 |
| Coastal erosion | Moderate 50/100 | Low 18/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 2 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Seaford | Frankston | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 9 | 23 |
| Rated above peers | 1 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 4 | 8 |
| Rated below peers | 2 | 4 |
Schools in Seaford
- Kananook Primary School Government · Primary above peers
- Belvedere Park Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- Patterson River Secondary College Government · Secondary at peers
- Seaford North Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- Seaford Park Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- Seaford Primary School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Frankston
- Frankston Heights Primary School Government · Primary above peers
- Frankston East Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- Frankston High School Government · Secondary at peers
- John Paul College Catholic · Secondary at peers
- Karingal Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- Kingsley Park Primary School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Seaford | Frankston | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 4 | 11 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 18 | 47 |
| Parks & reserves | 18 | 35 |
| Childcare | 17 | 26 |
| GPs | 5 | 21 |
| Pharmacies | 2 | 14 |
| Hospitals | 0 | 3 |
| Police stations | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 3 | 13 |
| Fuel stations | 7 | 10 |
| EV chargers | 0 | 3 |
| Waterways | 1 | 4 |
Mobility
Frankston sits further from the CBD (54.7 km vs 51.9 km).
| Seaford | Frankston | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 62/100 | 82/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 51.9 km | 54.7 km +5% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 47 min same for both | |
| Public transport score | 94/100 Rail · Bus | 92/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 206.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 580.5 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.7% postcode 3198 | 1.0% postcode 3199 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 29 postcode 3198 | 28 postcode 3199 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (67.0%).
Setting
| Seaford | Frankston | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 4 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 40 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 1.2 km 1.3 km to a named beach | 2.5 km 2.7 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Seaford | Frankston | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 89/100 | 92/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the curb | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 46% 9,914 premises | 64% 20,948 premises |
Climate
| Seaford | Frankston | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | — same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 24.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 8.3°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Seaford | Frankston | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 20.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.98 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Seaford | Frankston | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,795/yr same for both | |
| Council | Frankston same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Seaford | Frankston | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Dunkley same for both | |
| Member | Jodie Belyea same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Seaford | Frankston | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Frankston
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Seaford
Other comparisons with Frankston
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.