Seacliff Park vs Trott Park
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Trott Park, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Seacliff Park: a median of $1.18 million, against $890,000 in Trott Park, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Seacliff Park tends to suit people living alone, while Trott Park suits couples and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Trott Park
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (24/100 vs 48/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (71% vs 58%)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (97% vs 84%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Trott Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($890,000 vs $1,175,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Seacliff Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (70/100 vs 62/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Seacliff Park
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (16% vs 3%)
- is more walkable (70/100 vs 62/100)
- But Trott Park carries lower crime risk (24/100 vs 48/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
They split
one each way, out of the 2 things we measure here
- Seacliff Park is growing faster (8.4% vs 0.6%)
- Trott Park returns a higher gross yield on houses (3.9% vs 3.2%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Seacliff Park and Trott Park drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Seacliff Park skews older (41 vs 39).
| Seacliff Park | Trott Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,644 | 3,124 +18% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +8.4% | +0.6% |
| Median age | 41 | 39 |
| Median household income | $88,036/yr | $91,104/yr +3% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $370/wk +5% vs other | $350/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (13.9%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.1%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (8.9%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Seacliff Park | Trott Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,175,000 | $890,000 |
| Median unit price | $665,000 | — |
| Median land price | $948,000 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 26 days from 27 sales | 19 days from 19 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
47 vs 24 sales
28 vs 8 sales
Zoning mix
| Seacliff Park | Trott Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 53% | 61% |
| Environmental | 39% | 31% |
| Industrial | 5% | 7% |
| Parks and recreation | 2% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Seacliff Park | Trott Park | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 809 across Marion same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -31% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Seacliff Park | Trott Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.2% $750/wk on $1.2M | 3.9% $625/wk on $824K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within SA
| Seacliff Park | Trott Park | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 42% of SA | Higher than 43% of SA |
| Income | Higher than 67% of SA | Higher than 70% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 88% of SA | Higher than 85% of SA |
| Affordability | Higher than 68% of SA | Higher than 71% of SA |
| EV adoption | Higher than 84% of SA | Higher than 67% of SA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 86% of SA | Higher than 88% of SA |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 23% of SA | Higher than 53% of SA |
Liveability
Seacliff Park is more walkable (70 vs 62).
| Seacliff Park | Trott Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 65/100 | 63/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 |
Risk profile
Trott Park carries more bushfire risk (46 vs 0); Seacliff Park carries more flood risk (64 vs 11).
| Seacliff Park | Trott Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Moderate 46/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 48/100 | Low 24/100 |
| Flood | Moderate 64/100 | Low 11/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 3 within 5 km | 4 within 5 km |
Schools
| Seacliff Park | Trott Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 2 Bedford Park, 4.3 km | 2 Bedford Park, 6.0 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 2.0% | 1.7% |
Amenities in the suburb
| Seacliff Park | Trott Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 same for both | |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 5 |
| Childcare | 0 | 1 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 0 | 1 |
Mobility
| Seacliff Park | Trott Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 70/100 | 62/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 19.4 km | 19.7 km +2% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 25 min | 27 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus | 78/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 86.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 57.5 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual | 1 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.4% postcode 5049 | 0.7% postcode 5158 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 67 postcode 5049 | 74 postcode 5158 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (82.4%).
Setting
| Seacliff Park | Trott Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 118 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 150 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 1.4 km | 3.6 km |
NBN connectivity
| Seacliff Park | Trott Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 75/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 2% 1,195 premises | 23% 1,197 premises |
Climate
| Seacliff Park | Trott Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 394 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.1°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 7.8°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Seacliff Park | Trott Park | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | — same for both | |
| PM10 | 19.5 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.34 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Seacliff Park | Trott Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,782/yr same for both | |
| Council | Marion same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Seacliff Park | Trott Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Boothby | Kingston |
| Member | Louise Miller-Frost | Amanda Rishworth |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Seacliff Park | Trott Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Seacliff Park
Trott Park
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Seacliff Park
Other comparisons with Trott Park
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.