Seacliff Park vs Seacliff
Seacliff Park is the younger of the two, with a median age of 41 against 46 in Seacliff. In both, the large majority of households own their home and most homes are detached houses. Houses cost more in Seacliff: a median of $1.6 million, against $1.18 million in Seacliff Park, though rent is higher in Seacliff Park. Seacliff is closer to the city centre: 17 km, against 19.4 km. On these figures, Seacliff Park tends to suit buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Seacliff Park has more separate houses rather than flats (84% vs 66%)
- Seacliff has more childcare (4 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Seacliff Park has cheaper houses ($1,175,000 vs $1,600,000)
- Seacliff has cheaper land ($412,450 vs $948,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Seacliff
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- sits closer to the CBD (17 km vs 19.4 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Seacliff
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (34% vs 16%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Seacliff Park and Seacliff drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Seacliff has higher household incomes ($100,412 vs $88,036); Seacliff skews older (46 vs 41).
| Seacliff Park | Seacliff | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,644 +20% vs other | 2,117 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +8.4% | +8.2% |
| Median age | 41 | 46 |
| Median household income | $88,036/yr | $100,412/yr +14% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $370/wk +5% vs other | $350/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.2%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.5%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (9.2%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Seacliff Park | Seacliff | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,175,000 | $1,600,000 |
| Median unit price | $665,000 | $653,250 |
| Median land price | $948,000 | $412,450 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 26 days from 27 sales | 26 days from 25 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
47 vs 33 sales
28 vs 15 sales
Zoning mix
Seacliff Park has more land zoned for conservation (39% vs 0%).
| Seacliff Park | Seacliff | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 53% | 89% |
| Environmental | 39% | 0% |
| Parks and recreation | 2% | 11% |
| Industrial | 5% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Seacliff Park | Seacliff | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 809 across Marion | 287 across Holdfast Bay |
| Approvals change year on year | -31% | +188% |
Gross rental yield
| Seacliff Park | Seacliff | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.2% $750/wk on $1.2M | 3.2% $715/wk on $1.16M |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within SA
| Seacliff Park | Seacliff | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 42% of SA | Higher than 85% of SA |
| Income | Higher than 67% of SA | Higher than 79% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 88% of SA | Higher than 89% of SA |
| Affordability | Higher than 68% of SA | Higher than 24% of SA |
| EV adoption | Higher than 84% of SA same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 86% of SA | Higher than 85% of SA |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 23% of SA | Higher than 22% of SA |
Liveability
| Seacliff Park | Seacliff | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 65/100 | 63/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 | very advantaged area decile 9/10 |
Risk profile
Seacliff carries more flood risk (84 vs 64).
| Seacliff Park | Seacliff | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 48/100 | Moderate 50/100 |
| Flood | Moderate 64/100 | High 84/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 3 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Seacliff Park | Seacliff | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
| Universities within 10 km | 2 Bedford Park, 4.3 km | 2 Bedford Park, 4.6 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 2.0% | 2.4% |
Schools in Seacliff Park
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Seacliff
- Seacliff Primary School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Seacliff Park | Seacliff | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 same for both | |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 2 |
| Childcare | 0 | 4 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 0 |
Mobility
Seacliff Park sits further from the CBD (19.4 km vs 17 km).
| Seacliff Park | Seacliff | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 70/100 | 71/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 19.4 km +12% vs other | 17 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 25 min same for both | |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus | 91/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 86.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 52.8 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual | 1 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.4% postcode 5049 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 67 postcode 5049 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (76.6%).
Setting
| Seacliff Park | Seacliff | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 118 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 30 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 1.4 km | 380 m |
NBN connectivity
| Seacliff Park | Seacliff | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 75/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 2% 1,195 premises | 0% 989 premises |
Climate
| Seacliff Park | Seacliff | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 394 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.1°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 7.8°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Seacliff Park | Seacliff | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | — same for both | |
| PM10 | 19.5 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.34 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Seacliff Park | Seacliff | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,782/yr | $2,095/yr |
| Council | Marion | Holdfast Bay |
Federal electorate
| Seacliff Park | Seacliff | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Boothby same for both | |
| Member | Louise Miller-Frost same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Seacliff Park | Seacliff | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Seacliff Park
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Seacliff Park
Other comparisons with Seacliff
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.