Sandy Ridges vs Wattle Camp
Comparing Sandy Ridges and Wattle Camp, QLD: Wattle Camp carries more bushfire risk (37 vs 0); Wattle Camp has more residents (543 vs 111); and Wattle Camp sits further from the CBD (217.4 km vs 205.9 km).
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Sandy Ridges is already more of a family suburb (52% vs 42%)
- Wattle Camp carries lower crime risk (67/100 vs 78/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Wattle Camp
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (21% vs 35%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Sandy Ridges
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (22% vs 27%)
- has cheaper rent ($195/wk vs $235/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Sandy Ridges
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (164 min vs 175 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (205.9 km vs 217.4 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Wattle Camp
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (67/100 vs 78/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Sandy Ridges
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (24.7% vs 5.0%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Sandy Ridges and Wattle Camp drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Wattle Camp has more residents (543 vs 111); Wattle Camp rents higher ($235/wk vs $195/wk).
| Sandy Ridges | Wattle Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 111 | 543 +389% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +24.7% | +5.0% |
| Median age | 52 same for both | |
| Median household income | $46,800/yr +3% vs other | $45,604/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $195/wk | $235/wk +21% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.4%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.4%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.1%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Sandy Ridges | Wattle Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $502,500 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $260,750 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 60 days from 3 sales |
Development activity
| Sandy Ridges | Wattle Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 198 across South Burnett same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -18% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Sandy Ridges | Wattle Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 9% of QLD | Higher than 7% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 29% of QLD | Higher than 1% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 12% of QLD | Higher than 11% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 56% of QLD | Higher than 48% of QLD |
Liveability
| Sandy Ridges | Wattle Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | D |
| Score | — | 12/100 |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 2/10 | high-need area decile 1/10 |
Risk profile
Wattle Camp carries more bushfire risk (37 vs 0); Sandy Ridges carries more crime risk (78 vs 67).
| Sandy Ridges | Wattle Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Low 37/100 |
| Crime | High 78/100 | Moderate 67/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Sandy Ridges | Wattle Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Sandy Ridges | Wattle Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| Waterways | 2 | 1 |
Mobility
Wattle Camp sits further from the CBD (217.4 km vs 205.9 km).
| Sandy Ridges | Wattle Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Brisbane | 205.9 km | 217.4 km +6% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 164 min | 175 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.1% postcode 4615 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 67 postcode 4615 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (83.2%).
Setting
| Sandy Ridges | Wattle Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 331 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 368 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Sandy Ridges | Wattle Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 49 premises | 0% 292 premises |
Council rates
| Sandy Ridges | Wattle Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,401/yr same for both | |
| Council | South Burnett same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Sandy Ridges | Wattle Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Maranoa same for both | |
| Member | David Littleproud same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Sandy Ridges | Wattle Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Sandy Ridges
Other comparisons with Wattle Camp
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.