San Remo vs Kilcunda
San Remo is the younger of the two, with a median age of 52 against 55 in Kilcunda. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In San Remo, about half of households are people living alone. Houses cost more in Kilcunda: a median of $930,000, against $820,000 in San Remo.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
San Remo
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more schools inside the suburb (2 vs 0)
- has more parks and reserves (5 vs 2)
- But Kilcunda has more separate houses rather than flats (100% vs 83%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
San Remo
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($820,000 vs $930,000)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
San Remo
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (24% vs 12%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
San Remo
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (95 min vs 100 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (120.7 km vs 125.5 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Too close to call
Nothing among the 4 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Kilcunda
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (46.0% vs 35.6%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
San Remo and Kilcunda drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
San Remo has more residents (1,700 vs 578); Kilcunda skews older (55 vs 52).
| San Remo | Kilcunda | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,700 +66% vs other | 578 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +35.6% | +46.0% |
| Median age | 52 | 55 |
| Median household income | $69,524/yr | $73,424/yr +6% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $301/wk | $315/wk +5% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.1%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.9%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (7.6%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| San Remo | Kilcunda | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $820,000 | $930,000 |
| Median unit price | $410,000 | — |
| Median land price | $422,500 | $397,500 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 73 days from 28 sales | 73 days from 7 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
27 vs 6 sales
24 vs 5 sales
Zoning mix
| San Remo | Kilcunda | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 77% | 78% |
| Parks and recreation | 7% | 15% |
| Residential | 12% | 4% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 2% same for both | |
| Planning zones cover 98% of San Remo and 100% of Kilcunda. The rest is unzoned land such as water or road reserve. | ||
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| San Remo | Kilcunda | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 393 across Bass Coast same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +0% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| San Remo | Kilcunda | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 2.9% $550/wk on $970K | — |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| San Remo | Kilcunda | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 57% of VIC | — |
| Income | Higher than 31% of VIC | — |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 37% of VIC same for both | |
| Affordability | Higher than 24% of VIC | — |
| EV adoption | Higher than 83% of VIC | Higher than 74% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 90% of VIC | Higher than 61% of VIC |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 11% of VIC | — |
Liveability
| San Remo | Kilcunda | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | C |
| Score | 51/100 | 47/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 | advantaged area decile 7/10 |
Risk profile
Kilcunda carries more flood risk (58 vs 33).
| San Remo | Kilcunda | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 53/100 | Moderate 55/100 |
| Flood | Low 33/100 | Moderate 58/100 |
| Coastal erosion | Moderate 59/100 | Low 36/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| San Remo | Kilcunda | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 2 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in San Remo
- San Remo Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- Bass Coast College - San Remo Campus Government · Secondary
Schools in Kilcunda
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| San Remo | Kilcunda | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 9 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 2 |
| Childcare | 2 | 0 |
| GPs | 1 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 0 |
| Police stations | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 2 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 0 |
| Beaches | 4 | 2 |
| Waterways | 1 | 9 |
Mobility
Kilcunda sits further from the CBD (125.5 km vs 120.7 km).
| San Remo | Kilcunda | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Melbourne | 120.7 km | 125.5 km +4% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 95 min | 100 min |
| Public transport score | 24/100 same for both | |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 1.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 1.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 36 min scheduled, not actual | 58 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.2% postcode 3925 | 0.9% postcode 3995 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 40 postcode 3925 | 47 postcode 3995 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (66.3%).
Setting
| San Remo | Kilcunda | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 85 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 28 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 1.0 km 1.0 km to a named beach | 1.3 km 1.3 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| San Remo | Kilcunda | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 79/100 | 30/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 62% 1,618 premises | 0% 366 premises |
Climate
| San Remo | Kilcunda | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 704 mm | 906 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | 24.1°C | 24.6°C |
| Winter min (Jul) | 8.6°C | 6.9°C |
Council rates
| San Remo | Kilcunda | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,727/yr same for both | |
| Council | Bass Coast same for both | |
Federal electorate
| San Remo | Kilcunda | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Monash same for both | |
| Member | Mary Aldred same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| San Remo | Kilcunda | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with San Remo
Other comparisons with Kilcunda
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.