Rural View vs Bucasia
Rural View is the younger of the two, with a median age of 31 against 35 in Bucasia. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Rural View, most households are couple families. In Bucasia, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Rural View: a median of $745,000, against $685,000 in Bucasia, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Rural View tends to suit couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Rural View
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more childcare (8 vs 2)
- has more schools rated above their peers (2 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Rural View has cheaper land ($540,000 vs $680,000)
- Bucasia has cheaper units ($209,500 vs $465,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Bucasia
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($380/wk vs $420/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Rural View
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (62/100 vs 38/100)
- has a shorter drive in (672 min vs 679 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (975.4 km vs 979.2 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 5 things we measure here
- Rural View is more walkable (62/100 vs 38/100)
- Bucasia has more GPs (2 vs 0)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Rural View
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (18.0% vs 3.0%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Rural View and Bucasia drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Rural View has higher household incomes ($128,492 vs $104,260); Bucasia skews older (35 vs 31).
| Rural View | Bucasia | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,657 +13% vs other | 4,915 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +18.0% | +3.0% |
| Median age | 31 | 35 |
| Median household income | $128,492/yr +19% vs other | $104,260/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $420/wk +10% vs other | $380/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.4%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.1%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.3%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Rural View | Bucasia | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $745,000 | $685,000 |
| Median unit price | $465,000 | $209,500 |
| Median land price | $540,000 | $680,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 23 days from 87 sales | 28 days from 62 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
54 vs 75 sales
133 vs 97 sales
15 vs 6 sales
Development activity
| Rural View | Bucasia | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 574 across Mackay same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -6% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Rural View | Bucasia | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 5.1% $770/wk on $789K | 5.3% $710/wk on $700K |
| Units | — | 14.5% $600/wk on $215K |
Ranking within QLD
| Rural View | Bucasia | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 93% of QLD | Higher than 77% of QLD |
| Schools | Higher than 92% of QLD | — |
| Walkability | Higher than 90% of QLD | Higher than 84% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 40% of QLD | Higher than 46% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 93% of QLD | Higher than 80% of QLD |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 92% of QLD | Higher than 95% of QLD |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 100% of QLD |
Liveability
Rural View is more walkable (62 vs 38); Rural View scores higher overall (69 vs 51).
| Rural View | Bucasia | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A | B |
| Score | 69/100 | 51/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 |
Risk profile
| Rural View | Bucasia | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 60/100 | Moderate 53/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 2 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Rural View | Bucasia | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 3 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 2 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 1 same for both | |
Schools in Rural View
- Eimeo Road State School Government · Primary above peers
- St Brendan's Catholic Primary School Catholic · Primary above peers
- Mackay Northern Beaches State High School Government · Secondary below peers
Schools in Bucasia
- Bucasia State School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Rural View | Bucasia | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 2 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 4 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 7 |
| Childcare | 8 | 2 |
| GPs | 0 | 2 |
| Pharmacies | 2 | 1 |
| Police stations | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 3 | 0 |
| Beaches | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 8 | 0 |
Mobility
Bucasia sits further from the CBD (979.2 km vs 975.4 km).
| Rural View | Bucasia | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 62/100 | 38/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 975.4 km | 979.2 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 672 min | 679 min |
| Public transport score | 43/100 Bus | 44/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 14.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 15.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 2 min scheduled, not actual | 1 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.3% postcode 4740 | 0.3% postcode 4750 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 56 postcode 4740 | 67 postcode 4750 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (85.0%).
Setting
| Rural View | Bucasia | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 10 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | -1 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 3.3 km 3.7 km to a named beach | 1.5 km 1.6 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Rural View | Bucasia | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 84/100 | 72/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Fibre to the node |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 72% 2,368 premises | 49% 2,031 premises |
Climate
| Rural View | Bucasia | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,633 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.6°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 14.5°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Rural View | Bucasia | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.6 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.9 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Rural View | Bucasia | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,873/yr same for both | |
| Council | Mackay same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Rural View | Bucasia | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Dawson same for both | |
| Member | Andrew Willcox same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Rural View | Bucasia | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Rural View
Other comparisons with Bucasia
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.