Run-O-Waters vs Tirrannaville
Run-O-Waters is the younger of the two, with a median age of 46 against 52 in Tirrannaville. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Run-O-Waters, most households are couple families. In Tirrannaville, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Tirrannaville: a median of $1.95 million, against $1.53 million in Run-O-Waters, though rent is higher in Run-O-Waters. On these figures, Run-O-Waters tends to suit families with children, couples, and buyers on a tighter budget, while Tirrannaville suits people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Run-O-Waters
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is already more of a family suburb (76% vs 55%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Run-O-Waters
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($1,532,500 vs $1,950,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Tirrannaville
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (20% vs 7%)
- has cheaper rent ($245/wk vs $475/wk)
- leaves renters under less rental stress (12% vs 21%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Run-O-Waters
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (21/100 vs 5/100)
- has a shorter drive in (135 min vs 143 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (201.9 km vs 212 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Run-O-Waters
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (21/100 vs 5/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Run-O-Waters
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (28.5% vs -0.8%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Run-O-Waters and Tirrannaville drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Run-O-Waters has more residents (605 vs 235); Run-O-Waters rents higher ($475/wk vs $245/wk).
| Run-O-Waters | Tirrannaville | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 605 +61% vs other | 235 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +28.5% | -0.8% |
| Median age | 46 | 52 |
| Median household income | $115,908/yr +9% vs other | $105,196/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $475/wk +48% vs other | $245/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.4%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.7%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.1%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Run-O-Waters | Tirrannaville | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,532,500 | $1,950,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $540,000 | — |
Zoning mix
Tirrannaville has more rural and farming land (88% vs 55%); Tirrannaville has more land zoned for conservation (12% vs 0%).
| Run-O-Waters | Tirrannaville | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 55% | 88% |
| Residential | 44% | 0% |
| Environmental | 0% | 12% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Run-O-Waters | Tirrannaville | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 332 across Goulburn Mulwaree same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -1% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Run-O-Waters | Tirrannaville | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 76% of NSW | Higher than 85% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 80% of NSW | Higher than 71% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 70% of NSW | Higher than 49% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 43% of NSW | Higher than 20% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 49% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 65% of NSW | Higher than 20% of NSW |
Liveability
Run-O-Waters is more walkable (21 vs 5).
| Run-O-Waters | Tirrannaville | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | — |
| Score | 60/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 | advantaged area decile 7/10 |
Risk profile
Tirrannaville carries more bushfire risk (63 vs 20).
| Run-O-Waters | Tirrannaville | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 20/100 | Moderate 63/100 |
| Crime | Low 13/100 | Low 15/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 4 within 5 km | 0 within 5 km |
Schools
| Run-O-Waters | Tirrannaville | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Run-O-Waters
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Tirrannaville
- Tirranna Public School Government · Primary
Amenities in the suburb
| Run-O-Waters | Tirrannaville | |
|---|---|---|
| Waterways | 1 | 11 |
Mobility
Tirrannaville sits further from the CBD (212 km vs 201.9 km).
| Run-O-Waters | Tirrannaville | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 21/100 | 5/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 201.9 km | 212 km +5% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 135 min | 143 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.5% postcode 2580 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 41 postcode 2580 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (79.4%).
Setting
| Run-O-Waters | Tirrannaville | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 693 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 666 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Run-O-Waters | Tirrannaville | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 44/100 | 15/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Satellite (Sky Muster) |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 211 premises | 0% 38 premises |
Climate
| Run-O-Waters | Tirrannaville | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 658 mm | 620 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | 27.1°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 2.7°C | 0.9°C |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Run-O-Waters | Tirrannaville | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 4.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 10.4 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.36 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Run-O-Waters | Tirrannaville | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,370/yr same for both | |
| Council | Goulburn Mulwaree same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Run-O-Waters | Tirrannaville | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Eden-monaro same for both | |
| Member | Kristy Mcbain same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Run-O-Waters | Tirrannaville | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Run-O-Waters
Other comparisons with Tirrannaville
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.