Round Mountain vs Tanglewood
Tanglewood is the younger of the two, with a median age of 43 against 50 in Round Mountain. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Round Mountain, about half of households are couple families. In Tanglewood, most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Round Mountain: a median of $3.1 million, against $1.58 million in Tanglewood, though rent is higher in Tanglewood. On these figures, Round Mountain tends to suit older residents, while Tanglewood suits young adults, people living alone, and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Round Mountain
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (17/100 vs 32/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (71% vs 56%)
- But Tanglewood has more separate houses rather than flats (110% vs 100%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Tanglewood
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (17% vs 36%)
- has cheaper houses ($1,585,000 vs $3,100,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Round Mountain
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($338/wk vs $463/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Round Mountain sits closer to the CBD (790.4 km vs 792.5 km)
- Tanglewood has a shorter drive in (504 min vs 512 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Round Mountain
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- has more residents already 65 and over (22% vs 12%)
- carries lower crime risk (17/100 vs 32/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Round Mountain and Tanglewood drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Round Mountain has more residents (148 vs 104); Tanglewood rents higher ($463/wk vs $338/wk).
| Round Mountain | Tanglewood | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 148 +30% vs other | 104 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +3.5% | +7.2% |
| Median age | 50 | 43 |
| Median household income | $71,500/yr | $97,500/yr +36% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $338/wk | $463/wk +37% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.3%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.7%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (14.9%).
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Round Mountain | Tanglewood | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $3,100,000 | $1,585,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $780,000 |
| Median land price | — | $1,200,000 |
Zoning mix
Round Mountain has more rural and farming land (53% vs 9%); Tanglewood has more land zoned for conservation (22% vs 7%).
| Round Mountain | Tanglewood | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 53% | 9% |
| Other and special use | 37% | 31% |
| Parks and recreation | 0% | 24% |
| Environmental | 7% | 22% |
| Residential | 1% | 12% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 2% same for both | |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Round Mountain | Tanglewood | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 331 across Tweed same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -50% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Round Mountain | Tanglewood | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 94% of NSW | Higher than 77% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 35% of NSW | Higher than 65% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 51% of NSW | Higher than 63% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 2% of NSW | Higher than 29% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 64% of NSW | Higher than 78% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 40% of NSW | Higher than 46% of NSW |
Liveability
| Round Mountain | Tanglewood | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Tanglewood carries more crime risk (32 vs 17); Tanglewood carries more bushfire risk (71 vs 59).
| Round Mountain | Tanglewood | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 59/100 | High 71/100 |
| Crime | Low 17/100 | Low 32/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Round Mountain | Tanglewood | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Round Mountain | Tanglewood | |
|---|---|---|
| Waterways | 0 | 1 |
Mobility
Tanglewood sits further from the CBD (792.5 km vs 790.4 km).
| Round Mountain | Tanglewood | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 8/100 | 14/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 790.4 km | 792.5 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 512 min | 504 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.6% postcode 2484 | 0.9% postcode 2488 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 76 postcode 2484 | 66 postcode 2488 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (79.6%).
Setting
| Round Mountain | Tanglewood | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 148 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 5 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 3.0 km 3.2 km to a named beach | 3.7 km 3.7 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Round Mountain | Tanglewood | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 28/100 | 29/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 58 premises | 0% 62 premises |
Climate
| Round Mountain | Tanglewood | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,569 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 29.1°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 9.1°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Round Mountain | Tanglewood | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,745/yr same for both | |
| Council | Tweed same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Round Mountain | Tanglewood | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Richmond same for both | |
| Member | Justine Elliot same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Round Mountain | Tanglewood | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Tanglewood
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Round Mountain
Other comparisons with Tanglewood
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.