Round Hill vs Chasm Creek
Chasm Creek is the younger of the two, with a median age of 47 against 52 in Round Hill. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Round Hill, most households are couple families. In Chasm Creek, about half of households are people living alone. On these figures, Chasm Creek tends to suit people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Round Hill
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is already more of a family suburb (67% vs 47%)
Weighs schools, house stock, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Round Hill
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (9% vs 15%)
- has cheaper rent ($185/wk vs $265/wk)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, and walkability.
Investors
Round Hill
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (-8.3% vs -22.1%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Round Hill and Chasm Creek drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Round Hill has more residents (100 vs 53); Chasm Creek rents higher ($265/wk vs $185/wk).
| Round Hill | Chasm Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 100 +47% vs other | 53 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -8.3% | -22.1% |
| Median age | 52 | 47 |
| Median household income | $106,132/yr +13% vs other | $92,612/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $185/wk | $265/wk +43% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.8%).
Zoning mix
Round Hill has more rural and farming land (36% vs 0%); Chasm Creek has more land zoned for conservation (89% vs 53%).
| Round Hill | Chasm Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental | 53% | 89% |
| Rural and farming | 36% | 0% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 5% | 9% |
| Industrial | 5% | 0% |
| Residential | 0% | 2% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Round Hill | Chasm Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 90 across Burnie same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +1200% same for both | |
Ranking within TAS
| Round Hill | Chasm Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 92% of TAS | Higher than 83% of TAS |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 87% of TAS | Higher than 85% of TAS |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 33% of TAS | Higher than 42% of TAS |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 74% of TAS | Higher than 34% of TAS |
Liveability
| Round Hill | Chasm Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | high-need area decile 1/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
| Round Hill | Chasm Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 8 within 5 km | 7 within 5 km |
Schools
| Round Hill | Chasm Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Round Hill | Chasm Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 1 same for both | |
Mobility
| Round Hill | Chasm Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 26/100 | 22/100 |
| Distance to Hobart | 324.8 km | 323.4 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 226 min | 222 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.4% postcode 7320 | 0.4% postcode 7321 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 19 postcode 7320 | 26 postcode 7321 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (87.0%).
Setting
| Round Hill | Chasm Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 173 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 98 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 779 m 1.5 km to a named beach | 408 m 2.8 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Round Hill | Chasm Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 42/100 | 28/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 62 premises | 0% 33 premises |
Climate
| Round Hill | Chasm Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 929 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 21.8°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 3.8°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Round Hill | Chasm Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,050/yr same for both | |
| Council | Burnie same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Round Hill | Chasm Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Braddon same for both | |
| Member | Anne Urquhart same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Round Hill | Chasm Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $20,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Round Hill
Other comparisons with Chasm Creek
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.