Rouchel vs Segenhoe

Segenhoe is the younger of the two, with a median age of 39 against 46 in Rouchel. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Segenhoe, most households are couple families. On these figures, Segenhoe tends to suit couples.

Which one suits you?

There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.

Families with school-age kids

Segenhoe

ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here

  • carries lower crime risk (29/100 vs 43/100)
  • is already more of a family suburb (59% vs 47%)

Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.

First-home buyers

Segenhoe

ahead on the one thing that separates them

  • leaves households under less mortgage stress (23% vs 33%)

Weighs mortgage stress.

Renters

Segenhoe

ahead on the one thing that separates them

  • has cheaper rent ($240/wk vs $343/wk)

Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.

Commuting to the city

Rouchel

ahead on the one thing that separates them

  • sits closer to the CBD (273.4 km vs 276.2 km)

Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.

Downsizers and retirees

Segenhoe

ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here

  • has more residents already 65 and over (18% vs 11%)
  • carries lower crime risk (29/100 vs 43/100)

Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.

Investors

Too close to call

Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.

Weighs population growth.

Where they sit

Rouchel and Segenhoe drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.

Rouchel Segenhoe
Hides rows where both suburbs match

Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.

Side by side, out of 100

Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.

Rouchel Segenhoe
Walkability 16 / 10
Rouchel — Walkability: 16/100 Segenhoe — Walkability: 10/100
Safety 57 / 71
Rouchel — Safety: 57/100 Segenhoe — Safety: 71/100
Low fire risk 69 / 57
Rouchel — Low fire risk: 69/100 Segenhoe — Low fire risk: 57/100

Demographics

Segenhoe has more residents (219 vs 137); Rouchel rents higher ($343/wk vs $240/wk).

Rouchel Segenhoe
Population 137 219
+60% vs other
Population trend (2016 → 2021) -6.8% -3.5%
Median age 46 39
Median household income $105,612/yr
+27% vs other
$76,856/yr
Median weekly rent $343/wk
+30% vs other
$240/wk

Age profile

Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.

Rouchel Segenhoe
0-4 2.2% / 3.7%
Rouchel — 0-4: 2.2% Segenhoe — 0-4: 3.7%
5-14 5.8% / 13.2%
Rouchel — 5-14: 5.8% Segenhoe — 5-14: 13.2%
15-19 8.8% / 5.0%
Rouchel — 15-19: 8.8% Segenhoe — 15-19: 5.0%
20-24 5.8% / 5.5%
Rouchel — 20-24: 5.8% Segenhoe — 20-24: 5.5%
25-34 16.1% / 15.1%
Rouchel — 25-34: 16.1% Segenhoe — 25-34: 15.1%
35-44 6.6% / 16.9%
Rouchel — 35-44: 6.6% Segenhoe — 35-44: 16.9%
45-54 17.5% / 11.4%
Rouchel — 45-54: 17.5% Segenhoe — 45-54: 11.4%
55-64 22.6% / 11.0%
Rouchel — 55-64: 22.6% Segenhoe — 55-64: 11.0%
65-74 8.0% / 10.0%
Rouchel — 65-74: 8.0% Segenhoe — 65-74: 10.0%
75-84 — / 5.0%
Rouchel — 75-84: not among its largest Segenhoe — 75-84: 5.0%
85+ 2.9% / 2.7%
Rouchel — 85+: 2.9% Segenhoe — 85+: 2.7%

Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.6%).

Who lives together

Household composition, 2021 Census.

Rouchel 31.6% couple families
Rouchel — Couple Families: 31.6% Rouchel — Lone Person: 36.8% Rouchel — One Parent Families: 15.8% Rouchel — Group Household: 15.8%
Segenhoe 59.4% couple families
Segenhoe — Couple Families: 59.4% Segenhoe — Lone Person: 40.6% Segenhoe — One Parent Families: 0.0% Segenhoe — Group Household: 0.0%
Couple Families Lone Person One Parent Families Group Household

Who owns and who rents

Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.

Rouchel 30.6% renting
Rouchel — Owned Outright: 47.2% Rouchel — Mortgage: 22.2% Rouchel — Renting: 30.6%
Segenhoe 29.1% renting
Segenhoe — Owned Outright: 41.8% Segenhoe — Mortgage: 29.1% Segenhoe — Renting: 29.1%
Owned outright Mortgage Renting

Where residents were born

Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.

Rouchel Segenhoe
England 5.8% / 4.1%
Rouchel — England: 5.8% Segenhoe — England: 4.1%
Ireland 2.2% / 4.6%
Rouchel — Ireland: 2.2% Segenhoe — Ireland: 4.6%
France — / 3.7%
Rouchel — France: not among its largest Segenhoe — France: 3.7%
New Zealand — / 1.4%
Rouchel — New Zealand: not among its largest Segenhoe — New Zealand: 1.4%

Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.8%).

Qualifications

Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.

Rouchel Segenhoe
Certificate III & IV 22.6% / 13.2%
Rouchel — Certificate III & IV: 22.6% Segenhoe — Certificate III & IV: 13.2%
Bachelor Degree 14.6% / 14.2%
Rouchel — Bachelor Degree: 14.6% Segenhoe — Bachelor Degree: 14.2%
Advanced Diploma / Diploma 5.8% / 6.4%
Rouchel — Advanced Diploma / Diploma: 5.8% Segenhoe — Advanced Diploma / Diploma: 6.4%
Graduate Diploma / Certificate — / 1.8%
Rouchel — Graduate Diploma / Certificate: not among its largest Segenhoe — Graduate Diploma / Certificate: 1.8%

Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.6%).

What people live in

Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.

Rouchel 100.0% houses
Rouchel — Houses: 100.0% Rouchel — Flats / Apartments: 0.0%
Segenhoe 95.1% houses
Segenhoe — Houses: 95.1% Segenhoe — Flats / Apartments: 4.9%
Houses Flats / Apartments

Zoning mix

Segenhoe has more land zoned for conservation (32% vs 3%); Rouchel has more rural and farming land (93% vs 68%).

Rouchel Segenhoe
Rural and farming 93% 68%
Environmental 3% 32%
Residential 3% 0%
Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09.

Development activity

Rouchel Segenhoe
New dwellings approved 41
across Upper Hunter
same for both
Approvals change year on year -20%
same for both

Ranking within NSW

Rouchel Segenhoe
House price —
same for both
Income Higher than 72% of NSW Higher than 45% of NSW
Schools —
same for both
Walkability Higher than 66% of NSW Higher than 57% of NSW
Affordability —
same for both
EV adoption Higher than 22% of NSW Higher than 14% of NSW
NBN connectivity Higher than 35% of NSW Higher than 42% of NSW

Liveability

Rouchel Segenhoe
Grade —
same for both
Score —
same for both
Socio-economic band advantaged area
decile 7/10
advantaged area
decile 8/10

Risk profile

Rouchel carries more crime risk (43 vs 29); Segenhoe carries more bushfire risk (43 vs 31).

Rouchel Segenhoe
Bushfire Low
31/100
Moderate
43/100
Crime Moderate
43/100
Low
29/100
Flood Not mapped
no mapped data here
same for both
Coastal erosion None
0/100
same for both
Aircraft noise None
0/100
same for both
Industrial facilities nearby 0
within 5 km
same for both

Schools

Rouchel Segenhoe
Inside the suburb 0
same for both
Rated above peers 0
same for both
Rated at peers 0
same for both
Rated below peers 0
same for both

Amenities in the suburb

Rouchel Segenhoe
Waterways 8 4

Mobility

Segenhoe sits further from the CBD (276.2 km vs 273.4 km).

Rouchel Segenhoe
Walkability score 16/100 10/100
Distance to Sydney 273.4 km 276.2 km
+1% vs other
Drive time (normal traffic) 199 min 201 min
Electric vehicle share 0.2%
postcode 2336
0.2%
postcode 2337
Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings 50
postcode 2336
41
postcode 2337

How people get to work

Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.

Rouchel Segenhoe
Car (driver) 82.8% / 57.4%
Rouchel — Car (driver): 82.8% Segenhoe — Car (driver): 57.4%
Worked from Home 10.9% / 20.9%
Rouchel — Worked from Home: 10.9% Segenhoe — Worked from Home: 20.9%
Walked Only 6.2% / 19.1%
Rouchel — Walked Only: 6.2% Segenhoe — Walked Only: 19.1%
Car (passenger) — / 2.6%
Rouchel — Car (passenger): not among its largest Segenhoe — Car (passenger): 2.6%

Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (82.8%).

Setting

Rouchel Segenhoe
Elevation 224 m
above sea level, at the suburb centre
203 m
above sea level, at the suburb centre

NBN connectivity

Rouchel Segenhoe
Connectivity score 25/100 28/100
Most common technology Fixed wireless
same for both
Full-fibre (FTTP) share 0%
44 premises
0%
66 premises

Climate

Rouchel Segenhoe
Annual rainfall 631 mm
same for both
Summer max (Jan) 31.6°C
same for both
Winter min (Jul) 4.1°C
same for both

Air quality (annual mean)

Rouchel Segenhoe
PM2.5 —
same for both
PM10 14.9 µg/m³
same for both
NO₂ —
same for both

Council rates

Rouchel Segenhoe
Average residential rate $968/yr
same for both
Council Upper Hunter
same for both

Federal electorate

Rouchel Segenhoe
Division New England
same for both
Member Barnaby Joyce
same for both
Party The Nationals
same for both

First Home Owner Grant

Rouchel Segenhoe
Grant amount $10,000
same for both
Property price cap $600,000
same for both
Eligibility New
same for both

Tags

Rouchel

Segenhoe

More comparisons

Other comparisons with Rouchel

Other comparisons with Segenhoe

Full data on Rouchel Full data on Segenhoe
Unlock full address-level data — $29/month

Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.

Save this page for later

We'll email you a link to this page so you can finish reading it on any device. We use your address once to send it and don't keep it.

or