Roseworthy vs Shea-Oak Log
Roseworthy is the younger of the two, with a median age of 38 against 49 in Shea-Oak Log. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Roseworthy, most households are couple families. In Shea-Oak Log, about half of households are couple families. On these figures, Roseworthy tends to suit families with children.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Roseworthy
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more childcare (3 vs 0)
- has more schools inside the suburb (2 vs 0)
- But Shea-Oak Log carries lower crime risk (41/100 vs 76/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Shea-Oak Log
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper rent ($150/wk vs $350/wk)
- leaves renters under less rental stress (9% vs 17%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Roseworthy
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (37/100 vs 0/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (57.7 km vs 64.1 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Shea-Oak Log
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (41/100 vs 76/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (18% vs 11%)
- But Roseworthy is more walkable (37/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Roseworthy and Shea-Oak Log drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Roseworthy has more residents (1,041 vs 141); Roseworthy rents higher ($350/wk vs $150/wk).
| Roseworthy | Shea-Oak Log | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,041 +86% vs other | 141 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +4.7% | +5.2% |
| Median age | 38 | 49 |
| Median household income | $107,796/yr +17% vs other | $89,648/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $350/wk +57% vs other | $150/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.7%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.2%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.1%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Roseworthy | Shea-Oak Log | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $880,500 | — |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $630,000 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 28 days from 36 sales | — |
Zoning mix
Shea-Oak Log has more rural and farming land (100% vs 83%).
| Roseworthy | Shea-Oak Log | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 83% | 100% |
| Residential | 10% | 0% |
| Industrial | 7% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Roseworthy | Shea-Oak Log | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 278 across Light same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +43% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Roseworthy | Shea-Oak Log | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.3% $750/wk on $915K | — |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within SA
| Roseworthy | Shea-Oak Log | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 85% of SA | Higher than 68% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 77% of SA | Higher than 28% of SA |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 52% of SA same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 92% of SA | Higher than 47% of SA |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 76% of SA | — |
Liveability
Roseworthy is more walkable (37 vs 0).
| Roseworthy | Shea-Oak Log | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | D | — |
| Score | 26/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 | advantaged area decile 7/10 |
Risk profile
Roseworthy carries more crime risk (76 vs 41).
| Roseworthy | Shea-Oak Log | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 90/100 | High 86/100 |
| Crime | High 76/100 | Moderate 41/100 |
| Flood | — same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km | 2 within 5 km |
Schools
| Roseworthy | Shea-Oak Log | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 2 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Roseworthy
- Roseworthy Primary School Government · Primary above peers
- Trinity College Roseworthy Independent · Primary at peers
Schools in Shea-Oak Log
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Roseworthy | Shea-Oak Log | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 0 |
| Childcare | 3 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 0 | 1 |
Mobility
Shea-Oak Log sits further from the CBD (64.1 km vs 57.7 km).
| Roseworthy | Shea-Oak Log | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 37/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 57.7 km | 64.1 km +11% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 46 min | 50 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.5% postcode 5371 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (85.9%).
Setting
| Roseworthy | Shea-Oak Log | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 118 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 144 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 30.0 km | 37.6 km |
NBN connectivity
| Roseworthy | Shea-Oak Log | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 80/100 | 29/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 65% 709 premises | 0% 63 premises |
Climate
| Roseworthy | Shea-Oak Log | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 404 mm | 460 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.0°C | — |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.6°C | — |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Roseworthy | Shea-Oak Log | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.5 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 18.7 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.31 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Roseworthy | Shea-Oak Log | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,297/yr same for both | |
| Council | Light same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Roseworthy | Shea-Oak Log | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Grey | Barker |
| Member | Tom Venning | Tony Pasin |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Roseworthy | Shea-Oak Log | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Roseworthy
Other comparisons with Shea-Oak Log
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.