Rosewood vs Yippin Creek
Yippin Creek is the younger of the two, with a median age of 37 against 52 in Rosewood. In both, most households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Yippin Creek: a median of $827,000, against $280,000 in Rosewood, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Rosewood tends to suit buyers on a tighter budget, while Yippin Creek suits families with children.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Yippin Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is already more of a family suburb (70% vs 58%)
Weighs schools, house stock, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Rosewood
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- has cheaper houses ($280,000 vs $827,000)
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (18% vs 29%)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Rosewood
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (18% vs 29%)
- has cheaper rent ($315/wk vs $450/wk)
- But Yippin Creek has a bigger rental market to choose from (26% vs 12%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Yippin Creek
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (29/100 vs 9/100)
- has a shorter drive in (261 min vs 266 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (377.3 km vs 381 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Yippin Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (29/100 vs 9/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, and walkability.
Investors
Yippin Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (288.7% vs -1.3%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Rosewood and Yippin Creek drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Yippin Creek has more residents (758 vs 221); Yippin Creek rents higher ($450/wk vs $315/wk).
| Rosewood | Yippin Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 221 | 758 +243% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -1.3% | +288.7% |
| Median age | 52 | 37 |
| Median household income | $89,856/yr +10% vs other | $80,756/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $315/wk | $450/wk +43% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.2%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.5%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.2%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Rosewood | Yippin Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $280,000 | $827,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $125,000 | — |
Zoning mix
| Rosewood | Yippin Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 92% | 86% |
| Residential | 4% | 9% |
| Environmental | 4% same for both | |
| Parks and recreation | 0% | 1% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Rosewood | Yippin Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 546 across Port Macquarie-Hastings same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +33% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Rosewood | Yippin Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 6% of NSW | Higher than 35% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 58% of NSW | Higher than 48% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 55% of NSW | Higher than 75% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 96% of NSW | Higher than 63% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 50% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 52% of NSW | Higher than 95% of NSW |
Liveability
Yippin Creek is more walkable (29 vs 9).
| Rosewood | Yippin Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | C |
| Score | — | 43/100 |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 3/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 |
Risk profile
Rosewood carries more bushfire risk (16 vs 0).
| Rosewood | Yippin Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 16/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | — | Moderate 63/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Rosewood | Yippin Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Rosewood | Yippin Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 2 |
| Waterways | 3 same for both | |
Mobility
Rosewood sits further from the CBD (381 km vs 377.3 km).
| Rosewood | Yippin Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 9/100 | 29/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 381 km | 377.3 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 266 min | 261 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.5% postcode 2446 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 69 postcode 2446 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (84.5%).
Setting
| Rosewood | Yippin Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 40 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 28 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 18.5 km | 16.1 km |
NBN connectivity
| Rosewood | Yippin Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 | 92/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 87 premises | 86% 320 premises |
Climate
| Rosewood | Yippin Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 2,842 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 29.0°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.7°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Rosewood | Yippin Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.1 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 11.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.92 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Rosewood | Yippin Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,325/yr same for both | |
| Council | Port Macquarie-Hastings same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Rosewood | Yippin Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Lyne same for both | |
| Member | Alison Penfold same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Rosewood | Yippin Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Rosewood
Yippin Creek
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Rosewood
Other comparisons with Yippin Creek
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.