Roseville vs Lindfield
In both, most households own their home and most households are couple families. In Roseville, most homes are detached houses. Roseville is closer to the city centre: 12 km, against 14.6 km.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Lindfield
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more schools inside the suburb (8 vs 2)
- has more parks and reserves (19 vs 16)
- But Roseville has more separate houses rather than flats (69% vs 52%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Roseville sits closer to the CBD (12 km vs 14.6 km)
- Lindfield is more walkable (89/100 vs 80/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Lindfield
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more GPs (4 vs 2)
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (48% vs 31%)
- is more walkable (89/100 vs 80/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Lindfield
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- is growing faster (11.8% vs 2.6%)
- returns a higher gross yield on houses (3.5% vs 2.3%)
- But Roseville returns a higher gross yield on units (4.8% vs 4.3%)
Weighs house yield, unit yield, and population growth.
Where they sit
Roseville and Lindfield drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Roseville has higher household incomes ($166,400 vs $147,316).
| Roseville | Lindfield | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,340 | 10,943 +6% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +2.6% | +11.8% |
| Median age | 40 same for both | |
| Median household income | $166,400/yr +11% vs other | $147,316/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $600/wk same for both | |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.4%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (12.2%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (27.4%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Roseville | Lindfield | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $3,990,000 | $3,860,000 |
| Median unit price | $1,075,000 | $1,151,000 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 23 days from 94 sales | 28 days from 91 sales |
Unit price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
19 vs 24 sales
71 vs 59 sales
27 vs 36 sales
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
24 vs 17 sales
50 vs 49 sales
38 vs 38 sales
8 vs 6 sales
Zoning mix
Lindfield has more land zoned for conservation (31% vs 9%).
| Roseville | Lindfield | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 76% | 57% |
| Environmental | 9% | 31% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 5% | 7% |
| Parks and recreation | 6% | 4% |
| Industrial | 2% | 0% |
| Commercial | 1% same for both | |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Roseville | Lindfield | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 908 across Ku-ring-gai same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +0% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Roseville | Lindfield | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 2.3% $1,650/wk on $3.67M | 3.5% $1,900/wk on $2.83M |
| Units | 4.8% $878/wk on $950K | 4.3% $950/wk on $1.15M |
Ranking within NSW
| Roseville | Lindfield | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 97% of NSW same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 97% of NSW | Higher than 94% of NSW |
| Schools | — | Higher than 50% of NSW |
| Walkability | Higher than 92% of NSW | Higher than 96% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 10% of NSW | Higher than 7% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 99% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 92% of NSW same for both | |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 5% of NSW | Higher than 45% of NSW |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 58% of NSW | Higher than 37% of NSW |
Liveability
Roseville scores higher overall (79 vs 69); Lindfield is more walkable (89 vs 80).
| Roseville | Lindfield | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A same for both | |
| Score | 79/100 | 69/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Lindfield carries more bushfire risk (70 vs 52).
| Roseville | Lindfield | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 52/100 | High 70/100 |
| Crime | Low 27/100 | Low 31/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 4 within 5 km | 3 within 5 km |
Schools
| Roseville | Lindfield | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 2 | 8 |
| Rated above peers | 2 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 Macquarie University Wallumattagal Campus at North Ryde, 5.1 km | 2 Macquarie University Wallumattagal Campus at North Ryde, 3.2 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 4.6% | 4.5% |
Schools in Roseville
- Roseville College Independent · Combined above peers
- Roseville Public School Government · Primary above peers
Schools in Lindfield
- Holy Family Catholic Primary School Catholic · Primary above peers
- Lindfield Public School Government · Primary above peers
- Lindfield Learning Village Government · Combined below peers
- Aurora College Government · Secondary
- Highfields Preparatory and Kindergarten School Independent · Primary
- Lindfield Montessori Preschool Independent · Primary
Amenities in the suburb
| Roseville | Lindfield | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 3 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 12 | 9 |
| Parks & reserves | 16 | 19 |
| Childcare | 10 | 11 |
| GPs | 2 | 4 |
| Pharmacies | 2 | 4 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 3 |
| Fuel stations | 2 | 1 |
| Waterways | 7 | 9 |
Mobility
Lindfield sits further from the CBD (14.6 km vs 12 km).
| Roseville | Lindfield | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 80/100 | 89/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 12 km | 14.6 km +22% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 20 min | 22 min |
| Public transport score | 94/100 Rail · Bus | 95/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 300.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 155.8 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 4.7% postcode 2069 | 4.7% postcode 2070 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 30 postcode 2069 | 25 postcode 2070 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (64.3%).
Setting
| Roseville | Lindfield | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 87 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 67 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 6.7 km 4.0 km to a named beach | 8.6 km |
NBN connectivity
| Roseville | Lindfield | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 84/100 | 86/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 35% 4,339 premises | 45% 5,070 premises |
Climate
| Roseville | Lindfield | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,176 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Roseville | Lindfield | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.4 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 14.2 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.23 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Roseville | Lindfield | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,626/yr same for both | |
| Council | Ku-ring-gai same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Roseville | Lindfield | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Bradfield same for both | |
| Member | Nicolette Boele same for both | |
| Party | Independent same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Roseville | Lindfield | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Roseville
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Roseville
Other comparisons with Lindfield
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.