Rosella vs Sandiford
Sandiford is the younger of the two, with a median age of 40 against 44 in Rosella. In both, the large majority of households own their home. In Sandiford, most households are couple families. On these figures, Rosella tends to suit people living alone, while Sandiford suits families with children and couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Sandiford
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more separate houses rather than flats (48% vs 10%)
- carries lower crime risk (30/100 vs 71/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (70% vs 58%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Sandiford
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($150/wk vs $200/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Rosella
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (13/100 vs 0/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (953.7 km vs 958.9 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Rosella
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (13/100 vs 0/100)
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (90% vs 57%)
- But Sandiford carries lower crime risk (30/100 vs 71/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Rosella and Sandiford drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Sandiford has more residents (168 vs 78); Rosella rents higher ($200/wk vs $150/wk).
| Rosella | Sandiford | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 78 | 168 +115% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -8.2% | -4.0% |
| Median age | 44 | 40 |
| Median household income | $100,724/yr +8% vs other | $92,248/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $200/wk +25% vs other | $150/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.0%).
Property market
| Rosella | Sandiford | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $848,500 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Development activity
| Rosella | Sandiford | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 574 across Mackay same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -6% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Rosella | Sandiford | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 75% of QLD | Higher than 65% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 75% of QLD | Higher than 33% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 41% of QLD same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 65% of QLD | Higher than 56% of QLD |
Liveability
Rosella is more walkable (13 vs 0).
| Rosella | Sandiford | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 |
Risk profile
Rosella carries more crime risk (71 vs 30).
| Rosella | Sandiford | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | High 71/100 | Low 30/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Rosella | Sandiford | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Rosella | Sandiford | |
|---|---|---|
| Childcare | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 0 | 3 |
Mobility
Sandiford sits further from the CBD (958.9 km vs 953.7 km).
| Rosella | Sandiford | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 13/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 953.7 km | 958.9 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 649 min | 653 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.3% postcode 4740 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 56 postcode 4740 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (100.0%).
Setting
| Rosella | Sandiford | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 12 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 14 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 4.6 km | 8.3 km |
NBN connectivity
| Rosella | Sandiford | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 39 premises | 0% 75 premises |
Climate
| Rosella | Sandiford | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,517 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.8°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 12.4°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Rosella | Sandiford | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.6 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.9 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Rosella | Sandiford | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,873/yr same for both | |
| Council | Mackay same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Rosella | Sandiford | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Capricornia same for both | |
| Member | Michelle Landry same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Rosella | Sandiford | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Rosella
Sandiford
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Rosella
Other comparisons with Sandiford
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.